Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector– a rapid evidence review

Author:

Garavito Germán Andrés Alarcón,Moniz Thomas,Mansilla Cristián,Iqbal Syka,Dobrogowska Rozalia,Bennin Fiona,Talwar Shivangi,Khalid Ahmad Firas,Vindrola-Padros Cecilia

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective. Methods The review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed. Results The review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement. Conclusions Evidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. Stewart R. Do evidence networks make a difference? J Dev Effect. 2018;10(1):171–8. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19439342.2018.1425734

2. Mansilla C, Herrera CA, Basagoitia A, Pantoja T. The evidence-informed policy network (EVIPNet) in Chile: lessons learned from a year of coordinated efforts. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2017;43:e36. Available from: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/33967

3. Caribbean Health Research Council. Translating health research to action: a toolkit for the Caribbean. 2008. Available from: https://ajpp-online.org/resources/downloads/05-ResearchIntoActionAToolkitForTheCaribbean.pdf

4. Stewart R, Boutron I, Akl EA. The global evidence Commission’s report provided a wake-up call for the evidence community. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;154:212–5. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0895435622002438

5. Share-Net International Digital Platform. Share-net international digital platform. 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3