Author:
Young Amber,Charania Nadia A.,Gauld Natalie,Norris Pauline,Turner Nikki,Willing Esther
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Maternal vaccinations for influenza and pertussis are recommended in New Zealand to protect mothers and their infant from infection. However, maternal immunisation coverage in New Zealand is suboptimal. Furthermore, there is unacceptable inequitable maternal immunisation rates across the country with Māori and Pacific women having significantly lower maternal immunisation rates than those of other New Zealanders.
Methods
This research set out to explore what pregnant/recently pregnant Māori and Pacific women knew about immunisation during pregnancy and what factors influenced their decision to be vaccinated. A semi-structured interview guide was developed with questions focusing on knowledge of pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy and decision-making. Māori and Pacific women aged over 16 years were purposively sampled and interviewed in Dunedin and Gisborne, New Zealand between May and August 2021. Interviews were analysed following a directed qualitative content approach. Data were arranged into coding nodes based on the study aims (deductive analysis) informed by previous literature and within these participant experiences were inductively coded into themes and subthemes.
Results
Not all women were aware of maternal vaccine recommendations or they diseases they protected against. Many underestimated how dangerous influenza and pertussis could be and some were more concerned about potential harms of the vaccine. Furthermore, understanding potential harms of infection and protection provided by vaccination did not necessarily mean women would choose to be vaccinated. Those who decided to vaccinate felt well-informed, had vaccination recommended by their healthcare provider, and did so to protect their and their infant’s health. Those who decided against vaccination were concerned about safety of the vaccines, lacked the information they needed, were not offered the vaccine, or did not consider vaccination a priority.
Conclusions
There is a lack of understanding about vaccine benefits and risks of vaccine-preventable diseases which can result in the reinforcement of negative influences such as the fear of side effects. Furthermore, if vaccine benefits are not understood, inaccessibility of vaccines and the precedence of other life priorities may prevent uptake. Being well-informed and supported to make positive decisions to vaccinate in pregnancy is likely to improve vaccine coverage in Māori and Pacific Island New Zealanders.
Funder
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. World Health A. Global vaccine action plan. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
2. Ministry of Health. Immunisation Handbook Wellington. New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2020. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/immunisation-handbook-2020. Accessed 20 Apr 2021.
3. World Health Organization. Influenza vaccines: WHO position paper. Geneva; 2005.
4. Immunisation Advisory Centre. Recommended and funded vaccines during pregnancy. Auckland: University of Auckland; 2021. Available from: https://www.immune.org.nz/sites/default/files/resources/Written%20Resources/ProgrammePregnancyImac20210813%20V01Final.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2021.
5. Critical illness due to 2009 A/H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2010;340:c1279.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献