Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Swedish Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP-S) is a method for healthcare to promote physical activity for prevention and treatment of health disorders. Despite scientific support and education campaigns, the use has been low. The aim of this study was to perform a process evaluation of an implementation intervention targeting the use of the PAP-S method in primary healthcare (PHC). Specifically, we wanted to evaluate feasibility of the implementation intervention, and its effect on the implementation process and the outcome (number of PAP-S prescriptions).
Methods
This was a longitudinal study using the Medical Research Council guidance for process evaluation of a 9-month implementation intervention among healthcare staff at three PHC centres in Sweden. Data was collected by: participatory observations of the implementation process; questionnaires to the staff before, after and 6 months after the implementation intervention; interviews after the implementation intervention; and number of PAP-S prescriptions.
Results
During the implementation intervention, the workplaces’ readiness-to-change and the healthcare staff’s confidence in using the PAP-S method were favourably influenced, as was the number of PAP-S prescriptions. After the implementation intervention, the number of PAP-S prescriptions decreased to about the same number as before the implementation intervention, at two out of three PHC centres. Four of the six implementation strategies appeared to impact on the implementation process: external facilitation; leadership engagement by a committed workplace management; local PAP-S coordinator taking a leading role and acting as local champion; educational outreach concerning how to use the PAP-S method.
Conclusion
The implementation intervention was not sufficient to produce sustained change of the healthcare staff’s behaviour, nor did it achieve favourable long-term outcome on the number of PAP-S prescriptions. The healthcare staffs’ sparse knowledge of the PAP-S method prior to the implementation intervention hampered the implementation. More hands-on education in how to use the PAP-S method introduced early in the implementation process is imperative for successful implementation of the PAP-S method. The findings also suggest that committed workplace management and local PAP-S coordinators, taking leading roles and acting as local champions, need to be firmly established at the PHC centres before the external facilitator withdraws.
Trial registration
Registered in the ISRCTN registry with study registration number: ISRCTN15551042 (Registration date: 12/01/2016).
Funder
The Regional Research Board of the County Councils in the Uppsala-Örebro region
Center for clinical research Dalarna
Uppsala University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2014.
2. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, Aryee M, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60.
3. Orrow G, Kinmonth A-L, Sanderson S, Sutton S. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e1389.
4. Socialstyrelsen. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. National guidelines for Methods of Preventing Disease in Healthcare. In: Swedish: Nationella riktlinjer för sjukdomsförebyggande metoder 2011 – stöd för styrning och ledning. Stockholm: Sweden: Socialstyrelsen; 2011.
5. Socialstyrelsen. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. National guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of unhealthy lifestyle habits. In: Swedish: Nationella riktlinjer för prevention och behandling vid ohälsosamma levnadsvanor 2018 – stöd för styrning och ledning. Stockholm: Sweden: Socialstyrelsen; 2018.