Author:
Hellfritz Michael Stefan,Waschkau Alexander,Steinhäuser Jost
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The evaluation and the improvement of the quality of telemedical care become increasingly important in times where this type of care is offered to a broad number of patients more and more. As telemedical care in an offshore setting has already been in use for decades, analyzing the extensive experience of offshore paramedics using telemedical care can help identify determinants of quality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore determinants of the quality of telemedical care using the experiences of experienced offshore paramedics.
Methods
We conducted a qualitative analysis of 22 semi-structured interviews with experienced offshore paramedics. The results were categorized in a hierarchical category system using content analysis as described by Mayring.
Results
All 22 participants were males, having a mean of 3.9 years of experience working with telemedicine support offshore. Generally, participants stated that for them telemedical interaction did not differ much from personal interaction. However, the offshore paramedics personality and way to communicate were mentioned to impact the quality of telemedical care as it influenced the way cases were presented. Furthermore, interviewees described it to be impossible to use telemedicine in cases of an emergency as it was too time-consuming, technically too complex, and lead to cognitive overload as other tasks with higher priority needed their attention. Three determinants of a successful consultation were mentioned: low levels of complexity in the reason for consultation, telemedical guidance training for the teleconsultant physician and for the delegatee.
Conclusion
Appropriate indications for telemedical consultation, communication training of consultation partners, and the impact of personality need to be addressed to enhance the quality of future telemedical care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Zanaboni P, Wootton R. Adoption of telemedicine: From pilot stage to routine delivery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2012;12(1):1. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/1
2. Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Aust Heal Rev. 2010;34(3):276–81.
3. Johnson C, Dupuis JB, Goguen P, Grenier G. Changes to telehealth practices in primary care in New Brunswick (Canada): a comparative study pre and during the COVID- 19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11 November):1–11.
4. Hurley ET, Haskel JD, Bloom DA, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Jazrawi LM, Bosco JA, et al. The Use and Acceptance of Telemedicine in Orthopedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed e-Health. 2021;27(6):657–62.
5. Agbali R, Balas AE, Beltrame F, De Leo G. A review of audiovisual telemedicine utilization and satisfaction assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Technol Assess Health Care [Internet]. 2022 Dec 20 [cited 2022 Sep 15];38(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34924067/