Abstract
Abstract
Background
Language discordance occurs in healthcare when staff and service users do not share proficiency in the same language. It is a global phenomenon impacting on the quality of health services, as person-centred practice requires communication to establish partnerships and rapport. In a country as linguistically diverse as South Africa, effective ways to navigate language discordance in health care are urgently required, yet there is limited research. This study aimed to describe how occupational therapists navigated language discordance when working in the public health sector in KwaZulu-Natal.
Methods
A qualitative descriptive design involved using purposive sampling to recruit occupational therapists as participants (n = 8) for 15 semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, which included reflective journal entries from all participants.
Results
The four emergent themes were: (1) concurrent use of strategies, (2) I’m doing as much I can, what more can I do? (3) Language definitely impacts that therapy process and lastly, (4) systemic oppression perpetuating language discordance.
Conclusion
Language discordance is a complex context-specific phenomenon, therefore insight into concurrent use of strategies is important to practitioners to enable them to navigate language discordance and ensure provision of quality services. These insights are significant for healthcare professionals and resource allocators as they shed light on the shortcomings of advocating for a single strategy such as providing trained interpreters. Successful navigation is characterised by determination, being kind to oneself, willingness to learn and use of pragmatic and flexible approaches. To prepare to navigate language discordance in a low-resource context, education should extend in time and scope, to include multiple strategies, culture and relevant languages.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. Krystallidou D, Langewitz W, van den Muijsenbergh M. Multilingual healthcare communication: Stumbling blocks, solutions, recommendations. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(3):512–6.
2. Sears J, Khan K, Ardern CI, Tamim H. Potential for patient-physician language discordance in Ontario. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:1–9.
3. Weng SS, Landes SD. Culture and language discordance in the workplace: Evidence from the national home health aide survey. Gerontologist. 2017;57(5):900–9.
4. Zendedel R, Schouten BC, van Weert JC, van den Putte B. Informal interpreting in general practice: Are interpreters’ roles related to perceived control, trust, and satisfaction? Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(6):1058–65.
5. Inagaki E, Farber A, Kalish J, Siracuse JJ, Zhu C, Rybin DV, Doros G, Eslami MH. Role of language discordance in complication and readmission rate after infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(5):1473–8.