Author:
van de Water Brittney J.,Longacre Ashley H.,Hotchkiss Jenny,Sonnie Mustapha,Mann Julie,Lemor Elizabeth
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Sierra Leone has one of the world’s highest maternal and infant mortality rates and suffers from a shortage of well-trained health professionals, including midwives. Prior to engaging in systematic interventions, it is critical to measure organizational readiness to gauge members’ psychological and behavioral preparedness to implement change. We aimed to measure the organizational readiness for implementing change and compare results among midwives and administrative leaders at two schools of midwifery in Sierra Leone prior to the rollout of a midwifery preceptor program.
Methods
The Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) survey is a validated 12-item questionnaire designed to assess two domains of organizational readiness for change: change commitment (motivation) and change efficacy (capacity). All survey items begin with the same prompt and a five-item Likert scale response, with seven questions about change commitment and five about change efficacy. Data collection occurred in two schools of midwifery in Sierra Leone during two day-long meetings with stakeholders. Statistical analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare independent samples: School 1 versus School 2 (site), midwife versus other roles (role).
Results
Participants included 42 respondents (mean age 41 years, 95% female). Surveys were distributed evenly between the two sites. Occupations included midwifery faculty (n = 8), administrators (n = 5), clinicians (n = 25), and clinical educators (n = 4). Domain 1 (change commitment) had a mean score of 4.72 (SD 0.47) while Domain 2 (change efficacy) had a mean score of 4.53 (SD 0.54) out of a total potential score of five. There were no statistically significant differences between site responses for Domain 1 (p = 0.5479) and Domain 2 (p = 0.1026) nor role responses for Domain 1 (p = 0.0627) and Domain 2 (p = 0.2520).
Conclusion
Stakeholders had very high overall readiness for change across all ORIC questions for both change commitment and change efficacy. Mean scores for change commitment were slightly higher which is not surprising given the low-resourced settings stakeholders work in while training students. High mean scores across sites and roles is encouraging as this novel preceptor program is currently being rolled out.
Funder
Connell School of Nursing
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. Reproductive SLN. Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Policy. WHO | Regional Office for Africa. Published August 4, 2023. https://www.afro.who.int/publications/sierra-leone-national-reproductive-maternal-newborn-child-and-adolescent-health-policy. Accessed 7 Aug 2023.
2. UNFPA, WHO, ICM. The State of the World’s Midwifery 2021. State of the World’s Midwifery 2021. https://www.unfpa.org/publications/sowmy-2021. Accessed 15 Oct 2022.
3. Sonnie M, Kella F, Stern A, et al. A Sierra Leone 2021 Midwifery Clinical Training needs Assessment: a call to action to Augment Clinical Precepting. Ann Glob Health. 2023;89(1):10. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3970.
4. Mann J, Brooks MB, Kella F, et al. The impact of clinical placement site, community clinic versus tertiary hospital, on midwifery students’ clinical learning experience in Sierra Leone: a cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):416. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04413-y.
5. Panda S, Dash M, John J, et al. Challenges faced by student nurses and midwives in clinical learning environment - A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;101:104875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104875.