Author:
LePoire Erin,Joseph Molly,Heald Ashley,Gadbois Danielle,Jones Amy,Russo Joan,Bowen Deborah J
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Since 2015, the New York State Office of Mental Health has provided state primary care clinics with outreach, free training and technical assistance, and the opportunity to bill Medicaid for the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) as part of its Collaborative Care Medicaid Program. This study aims to describe the characteristics of New York State primary care clinics at each step of CoCM implementation, and the barriers and facilitators to CoCM implementation for the New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program.
Methods
In this mixed-methods study, clinics were categorized into RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) steps. Clinics were sent a survey, which included questions related to payer mix, funding sources, billing codes used, and patient population demographics. Qualitative interviews were conducted with clinic representatives, focusing on barriers or facilitators clinics experienced affecting their progression to the next RE-AIM step.
Results
One thousand ninety-nine surveys were sent to primary care clinics across New York State, with 107 (9.7%) completing a survey. Significant differences were observed among the different RE-AIM steps for multiple demographic variables including primary payer, percentage of patients with a diagnose of depression or anxiety, and percent of behavioral health services that are reimbursed, in addition to others. Three main themes regarding barriers and facilitators to implementing CoCM for New York State Medicaid billing emerged from 31 qualitative interviews: (1) Billing requirements, (2) Reimbursement rates, and (3) Buy-in to CoCM.
Conclusions
Survey data align with what we would expect to see demographically in NYS primary care clinics. Qualitative data indicated that CoCM billing requirements/structure and reimbursement rates were perceived as barriers to providing CoCM, particularly with New York State Medicaid, and that buy-in, which included active involvement from organizational leaders and providers that understand the Collaborative Care model were facilitators. Having dedicated staff to manage billing and data reporting is one way clinics minimize barriers, however, there appeared to be a disconnect between what clinics can bill for and the reimbursed amount several clinics are receiving, illustrating the need for stronger billing workflows and continued refinement of billing options across different payers.
Funder
New York State Office of Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. Baumgartner JC, Aboulafia GN, McIntosh A. The ACA at 10: How Has It Impacted Mental Health Care? 2020. Cited 2022 Dec 13; Available from: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2020/aca-10-how-has-it-impacted-mental-health-care.
2. Weiner S. A growing psychiatrist shortage and an enormous demand for mental health services. AAMC News. 2022 Aug 9; Available from: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/growing-psychiatrist-shortage-enormous-demand-mental-health-services.
3. Santo L, Kang K. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2019 National Summary Tables. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/physician-visits.htm.
4. Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, Lovell K, Richards D, Gask L, et al. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Cited 2022 May 13; Available from: https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2.
5. Thota AB, Sipe TA, Byard GJ, Zometa CS, Hahn RA, McKnight-Eily LR, et al. Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):525–38.