Author:
Trankle Steven A.,Reath Jennifer
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aged care system in Australia is under pressure. Residential aged care facilities (RACFs) and general practitioners (GPs) have difficulty providing the care needed by their residents, particularly after hours. Many residents are given ambulance support and transferred to hospital emergency departments (EDs) for care that could be provided at RACFs. The MyEmergencyDoctor (MED) service was commissioned in a 12-month program (February 2020-February 2021) using ED physicians to provide afterhours telehealth care in six RACFs.
Methods
Using the NASSS framework, we synthesised descriptive analyses of statistical data from the MED service, RACFs and the ambulance service and a thematic analysis of interview data collected from GPs, RACF and MED service staff, and family members of residents.
Results
Most calls to MED (179/209) were resolved with in-house treatment thereby reducing ambulance usage and hospital admissions. Interviews further revealed that MED enabled timely care for residents who were unwell but did not need hospital transfer. Technology, training, and rapid access to MED assisted RACF staff and complemented usual GP care. MED potentially reduced GP burnout. Refresher training was considered important especially in RACFs with high staff turnover, as was greater afterhours access to medications.
Conclusions
The afterhours telehealth model provided in-house care and reduced ambulance transfers, and GPs and RACF staff generally felt supported. The service was easy to use and fostered good communications with GPs and RACF staff. Some GPs preferred to provide their own care, commenting on the need for a good understanding of patient and family needs and of the local context. Other stakeholders suggested this model could be extended to palliative care settings and to normal business hours when GPs were unavailable. The reduced ambulance and hospital use suggested benefits to wider health systems, however policies and funding that remunerate GPs, support community-based care and provide additional staffing in RACFs are needed to sustain afterhours telehealth in RACFs. Use of the NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability) Framework provided a valuable explanatory lens for our analyses.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Commonwealth of Australia. Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Final Report: Care, Dignity and Respect. Volume 1 (Summary and Recommendations); 2021. https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-03/final-report-volume-1.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2022.
2. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Supporting access to primary care for aged care residents: Australian Government; 2022. https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/phn/how-we-support-phns/aged-care. Accessed 14 Nov 2022.
3. Cherry JJ, Rich WC, McLennan PL. telemedicine in remote Australia: the royal flying doctor service (RFDS) medical chest program as a marker of remote health. Rural Remote Health. 2018;4:1–10.
4. Wakerman J, Humphreys JS. Sustainable primary health care services in rural and remote areas: Innovation and evidence. Aust J Rural Health. 2011;19(3):118–24.
5. Bradford NK, Caffery LJ, Smith AC. Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. Rural Remote Health. 2016;16(4):1–23.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献