Abstract
Abstract
Background
People with problems in functioning following severe injury or illness often need multiple and combined interventions in their rehabilitation processes. In these processes, communication and collaboration between the involved healthcare professionals are essential. Despite efforts in research and policy, communication across hospital and primary healthcare services and within the primary healthcare settings remains challenging. In one region of Norway, a new intermunicipal rehabilitation team has been established to supplement the traditional services and context-bound research is needed to gain insight into the complexity of the new communication structures that are developing. The aim of this study was to explore facilitators and barriers to communication to inform further improvement of the services.
Methods
A qualitative case study design was used to explore the exchange of patient information in the rehabilitation processes of four patients. Data collection included participant observations in communication situations and an exploration of the electronic patient records of these four patients. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the empirical data.
Results
The complex rehabilitation processes explored involved a large number of actors across healthcare organisational levels. Lacking a common culture for rehabilitation, poor access to written information and unclear responsibility for sharing information across organisational boundaries seemed to represent barriers to interprofessional communication. Joint meetings, the use of common rehabilitation tools and language and establishing informal communication channels served to facilitate communication.
Conclusion
The intermunicipal team collaborating across different organisational levels added complexity to communication structures, but also facilitated interprofessional communication by promoting formal and informal ways of exchanging information. However, the intricate organisational divisions of healthcare provision in the Norwegian context represent boundaries which can be difficult to overcome. Therefore, cross-organisational coordination services should be developed.
Funder
Stavanger Kommune/Municipality
Norges Forskningsråd
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Negrini S, Selb M, Kiekens C, Todhunter-Brown A, Arienti C, Stucki G, et al. Rehabilitation definition for research purposes. A global stakeholders’ initiative by Cochrane Rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022.
https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07509-8.
2. Carter RE, Lubinsky J. Rehabilitation research : principles and applications. Fifth edition / Russell E. Carter, Jay Lubinsky. ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016.
3. Krug E, Cieza A. Strengthening health systems to provide rehabilitation services. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(5):672–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1319391.
4. World Health Organization. Strengthening rehabilitation in health systems, EXECUTIVE BOARD 152nd session Agenda item 8: World Health Organization; 2023. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB152/B152%2810%29-en.pdf.
5. St.meld. nr. 47 (2008–2009). Samhandligsreformen - Rett behandling - på rett sted - til rett tid. [The Coordination Reform Report No. 47 to the Storting. Norway]. Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2009. Summary in English. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/report.no.-47-to-the-storting-2008-2009/id567201/ Accessed 29 Aug 2023.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献