Author:
Karunananthan Sathya,Bonacci Giovanni,Fung Celeste,Huang Allen,Robert Benoit,McCutcheon Tess,Houghton Deanne,Hakimjavadi Ramtin,Keely Erin,Liddy Clare
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Frailty is a complex condition that primary care providers (PCPs) are managing in increasing numbers, yet there is no clear guidance or training for frailty care.
Objectives
The present study examined eConsult questions PCPs asked specialists about patients with frailty, the specialists’ responses, and the impact of eConsult on the care of these patients.
Design
Cross-sectional observational study.
Setting
ChamplainBASE™ eConsult located in Eastern Ontario, Canada.
Participants
Sixty one eConsult cases closed by PCPs in 2019 that use the terms “frail” or “frailty” to describe patients 65 years of age or older.
Measurements
The Taxonomy of Generic Clinical Questions (TGCQ) was used to classify PCP questions and the International Classification for Primary Care 3 (ICPC-3) was used to classify the clinical content of each eConsult. The impact of eConsult on patient care was measured by PCP responses to a mandatory survey.
Results
PCPs most frequently directed their questions to cardiology (n = 7; 11%), gastroenterology (n = 7; 11%), and endocrinology (n = 6; 10%). Specialist answers most often pertained to medications (n = 63, 46%), recommendations for clinical investigation (n = 24, 17%), and diagnoses (n = 22, 16%). Specialist responses resulted in PCPs avoiding referral in 57% (n = 35) of cases whereas referrals were still required in 15% (n = 9) of cases. Specialists responded to eConsults in a median 1.11 days (IQR = 0.3–4.7), and 95% (n = 58) of cases received a response within 7 days. Specialists recorded a median of 15 min to respond (IQR = 10–20), with a median cost of $50.00 CAD (IQR = 33.33 – 66.66) per eConsult.
Conclusions
Through the analysis of questions and responses submitted to eConsult, this study provides novel information on PCP knowledge gaps and approaches to care for patients living with frailty. Furthermore, these analyses provide evidence that eConsult is a feasible and valuable tool for improving care for patients with frailty in primary care settings.
Funder
INSPIRE-PHC Applied Health Research Question
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J, Hogan DB, Hummel S, Karunananthan S, et al. Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm–issues and controversies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(7):731–7.
2. Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, Woo J, Romero-Ortuno R, Walston JD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1376–86.
3. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1365–75.
4. Jørgensen R, Brabrand M. Screening of the frail patient in the emergency department: a systematic review. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;45:71–3.
5. Sinha S, McKee A, Dunning J, Wong I, Nicin M, Muscedere J. We Can’t Address What We Don’t Measure Consistently: Building Consensus on Frailty in Canada. National Institute on Ageing at Ryerson University, Ryerson University, Toronto; 2018. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c2fa7b03917eed9b5a436d8/t/5dd3f6b8dcacb37f075231e9/1574172344714/Frailty%2BPaper%2BLayout_updated%2BCover.pd+-+Copy.pdf.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献