Cashing in: cost-benefit analysis framework for digital hospitals

Author:

Nguyen Kim-Huong,Comans Tracy,Nguyen Thi Thao,Simpson Digby,Woods Leanna,Wright Chad,Green Damian,McNeil Keith,Sullivan Clair

Abstract

Abstract Background For many countries, especially those outside the USA without incentive payments, implementing and maintaining electronic medical records (EMR) is expensive and can be controversial given the large amounts of investment. Evaluating the value of EMR implementation is necessary to understand whether or not, such investment, especially when it comes from the public source, is an efficient allocation of healthcare resources. Nonetheless, most countries have struggled to measure the return on EMR investment due to the lack of appropriate evaluation frameworks. Methods This paper outlines the development of an evidence-based digital health cost-benefit analysis (eHealth-CBA) framework to calculate the total economic value of the EMR implementation over time. A net positive benefit indicates such investment represents improved efficiency, and a net negative is considered a wasteful use of public resources. Results We developed a three-stage process that takes into account the complexity of the healthcare system and its stakeholders, the investment appraisal and evaluation practice, and the existing knowledge of EMR implementation. The three stages include (1) literature review, (2) stakeholder consultation, and (3) CBA framework development. The framework maps the impacts of the EMR to the quadruple aim of healthcare and clearly creates a method for value assessment. Conclusions The proposed framework is the first step toward developing a comprehensive evaluation framework for EMRs to inform health decision-makers about the economic value of digital investments rather than just the financial value.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Smith N, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C. From benefits idealisation to value optimisation: application in the digital health context. Aust Health Rev. 2020;44:706–22.

2. World Health Organization. Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions: a practical guide to conducting research and assessment. (2016).

3. Enam A, Torres-Bonilla J, Eriksson H. Evidence-based evaluation of eHealth interventions: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e10971.

4. Burton-Jones A, et al. Changing the conversation on evaluating digital transformation in healthcare: insights from an institutional analysis. Inf Organ. 2020;30:100255.

5. Pita-Barros P, Bourek A, Brouwer W, Lehtonen L. Assessing the impact of digital transformation of health services. Report of the EXPH (Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health). (2019).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3