Author:
Wood Sarah M.,Alston Laura,Beks Hannah,Mc Namara Kevin,Coffee Neil T.,Clark Robyn A.,Wong Shee Anna,Versace Vincent L.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Australia's inequitable distribution of health services is well documented. Spatial access relates to the geographic limitations affecting the availability and accessibility of healthcare practitioners and services. Issues associated with spatial access are often influenced by Australia's vast landmass, challenging environments, uneven population concentration, and sparsely distributed populations in rural and remote areas. Measuring access contributes to a broader understanding of the performance of health systems, particularly in rural/remote areas. This systematic review synthesises the evidence identifying what spatial measures and geographic classifications are used and how they are applied in the Australian peer-reviewed literature.
Methods
A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 2002 and 2022 was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Search terms were derived from three major topics, including: [1] Australian population; [2] spatial analysis of health service accessibility; and [3] objective physical access measures.
Results
Database searches retrieved 1,381 unique records. Records were screened for eligibility, resulting in 82 articles for inclusion. Most articles analysed access to primary health services (n = 50; 61%), followed by specialist care (n = 17; 21%), hospital services (n = 12; 15%), and health promotion and prevention (n = 3; 4%). The geographic scope of the 82 articles included national (n = 33; 40%), state (n = 27; 33%), metropolitan (n = 18; 22%), and specified regional / rural /remote area (n = 4; 5%). Most articles used distance-based physical access measures, including travel time (n = 30; 37%) and travel distance along a road network (n = 21; 26%), and Euclidean distance (n = 24; 29%).
Conclusion
This review is the first comprehensive systematic review to synthesise the evidence on how spatial measures have been applied to measure health service accessibility in the Australian context over the past two decades. Objective and transparent access measures that are fit for purpose are imperative to address persistent health inequities and inform equitable resource distribution and evidence-based policymaking.
Funder
Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
Australian Government’s Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference142 articles.
1. Baum F, Friel S. Politics, policies and processes: a multidisciplinary and multimethods research programme on policies on the social determinants of health inequity in Australia. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12): e017772.
2. Schneider E, Shah A, Doty M, Tikkanen R, Fields K, Williams II R. Mirror, Mirror 2021 – Reflecting Poorly: Health Care in the U.S. Compared to Other High-Income Countries [Internet]. The Commonwealth Fund; 2021 p. 39. Available from: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/Schneider_Mirror_Mirror_2021.pdf.
3. de Looper M, Lafortune G. Measuring Disparities in Health Status and in Access and Use of Health Care in OECD Countries [Internet]. 2009 Mar [cited 2022 Feb 17]. (OECD Health Working Papers; vol. 43). Report No.: 43. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/measuring-disparities-in-health-status-and-in-access-and-use-of-health-care-in-oecd-countries_225748084267.
4. Peters DH, Garg A, Bloom G, Walker DG, Brieger WR, Hafizur RM. Poverty and Access to health care in developing countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136(1):161–71.
5. Fullman N, Yearwood J, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, et al. Measuring performance on the healthcare access and quality index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2016. The Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2236–71.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献