Author:
Orhierhor Marian,Pringle Wendy,Halperin Donna,Parsons Janet,Halperin Scott A.,Bettinger Julie A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems and healthcare workers (HCWs) faced significant demands and unique challenges. In this qualitative study, we explore the effects of the COVID-19 public health policies on British Columbia’s frontline HCWs, describe what worked in the management of the pandemic, and elucidate the lessons learned that could be applied to future pandemic preparedness, recovery and response.
Methods
This qualitative descriptive study is part of a larger, national multi-case study on pandemic policy communication and uptake. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from November 2020- June 2021 with fourteen HCWs working in long-term care (LTC), acute care and public health settings. Data were inductively coded, and analyzed following a resilience framework for public health emergency preparedness, which emphasizes the essential elements of a public health system, vital to all phases of health emergency management, readiness, response and recovery.
Results
HCWs experienced confusion, frustration, uncertainty, anxiety, fatigue and stress, during the pandemic and detailed challenges that affected policy implementation. This included communication and coordination inconsistencies between the province and regional health authorities; lack of involvement of frontline staff in pandemic planning; inadequate training and support; inadequate personal protective equipment resource capacity and mobilization; and staffing shortages. HCWs recommended increased collaboration between frontline staff and policy makers, investment in preparing and practicing pandemic plans, and the need for training in emergency management and infection prevention and control.
Conclusions
Pandemic planning, response and recovery should include inputs from actors/key stakeholders at the provincial, regional and local levels, to facilitate better coordination, communication and outcomes. Also, given the critical roles of frontline HCWs in policy implementation, they should be adequately supported and consideration must be given to how they interpret and act on policies. Bi-directional communication channels should be incorporated between policymakers and frontline HCWs to verify the appropriate adoption of policies, reflective learning, and to ensure policy limitations are being communicated and acted upon by policy makers.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Research Nova Scotia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Lurie N, Saville M, Hatchett R, Halton J. Developing COVID-19 vaccines at pandemic speed. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):1969–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005630.
2. The Lancet Global Health. The future of the International Health Regulations. Lancet Glob Heal. 2022;10(7):e927. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00254-6.
3. World Health Organization. Ebola then and now: Eight lessons from West Africa that were applied in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/ebola-then-and-now (2019). Accessed 19 Oct 2022.
4. Piret J, Boivin G. Pandemics Throughout History. Front Microbiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.631736.
5. Health Canada. Learning from SARS: Renewal of public health in Canada-Report of the National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health; 2003. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/migration/phac-aspc/publicat/sars-sras/pdf/sars-e.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2022.