Author:
Stroth Lara C.,Jahns Franziska,Bode Berit,Stender Maike,Schmidt Michelle,Baschnegger Heiko,Epstein Nurith,Sandmeyer Benedikt,Nau Carla
Abstract
Abstract
Background
As the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the globe at the beginning of 2020, healthcare systems were forced to rapidly adapt and expand to meet the sudden surge in demand for intensive care services. This study is the first systematic analysis of the strategies employed by German hospitals to recruit personnel and expand bed capacities during the first wave of the pandemic, and to evaluate the effectiveness of those recruitment measures.
Methods
152 German hospitals with intensive care capacities were selected and invited to participate in an online-based retrospective survey. Factors like the geographic distribution, individual COVID burden and level of care were considered for inclusion in the sample. The data were analyzed descriptively.
Results
A total of 41 hospitals participated in the survey. The additional demand for intensive care beds was met primarily by activating intensive care beds that were previously considered as non-operational in existing intensive care units (81% of respondents) and by upgrading recovery rooms (73%). The physician staffing requirements were met at approximately 75%, while the nursing staffing requirements were only met by about 45%. Staffing needs were met through reallocations/transfers (85%), staff recruitment from parental leave or retirement (49%), increased hours worked by internal staff (49%), new staff hiring (44%) and increased use of temporary staff (32%). Staff reallocations/transfers to critical care within a hospital were rated as the most effective measure. In this context, specialized personnel mostly from anesthesiology departments were appointed to intensive care medicine.
Conclusions
Despite multiple recruitment efforts, the pandemic has exacerbated the nursing staff shortage. The reallocation of existing staff within hospitals was a key element in covering the staffing needs. However, additional measures and efforts are required in order to ensure that critically ill patients can be cared for without compromise. The results of this study may have important implications for healthcare providers and policymakers, offering an evidence-based foundation for responding to future public health emergencies with agility, efficiency, and success.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Gortana F, Klack M, Schröter A, Stahnke J, Stockrahm S, Tröger J. Sars-CoV-2: Wie das Coronavirus nach Deutschland kam. ZEIT ONLINE. 2020. https://www.zeit.de/wissen/gesundheit/2020-03/coronavirus-ausbreitung-zeitverlauf-landkreise-staedte-karte?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F. Accessed 23 Aug 2022.
2. Schilling J, Tolksdorf K, Marquis A, Faber M, Pfoch T, Buda S, et al. Die verschiedenen Phasen Der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland: Eine Deskriptive Analyse Von Januar 2020 Bis Februar 2021. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021;64:1093–106.
3. Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit. Berichte: Blickpunkt Arbeitsmarkt– Arbeitsmarktsituation im Pflegebereich. Nürnberg; 2022.
4. Blum K. Personalsituation in der Intensivpflege und Intensivmedizin. Deutsches Krankenhausinstitut e.V. 2017. https://www.dki.de/forschungsprojekte/forschungsberichte. Accessed 16 Aug 2022.
5. Glette MK, Aase K, Wiig S. The relationship between understaffing of nurses and Patient Safety in Hospitals - A Literature Review with thematic analysis. Open J Nurs. 2017;07.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Importance of Strategic Agility and Resilience in Work-Life Balance;Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science;2024-05-30