Author:
Cameron Emilie,Bryant Jamie,Cashmore Aaron,Passmore Erin,Oldmeadow Christopher,Neill Sarah,Milat Andrew,Mitchell Jo,Gatt Nicole,Macoun Edwina,Ioannides Sally J,Murray Carolyn
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Quit for new life (QFNL) is a smoking cessation initiative developed to support mothers of Aboriginal babies to quit smoking during pregnancy. The state-wide initiative provides support for pregnant women and their households including free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and follow up cessation advice. Services are also supported to implement systems-level changes and integrate QFNL into routine care. This study aimed to evaluate: (1) models of implementation of QFNL; (2) the uptake of QFNL; (3) the impact of QFNL on smoking behaviours; and (4) stakeholder perceptions of the initiative.
Methods
A mixed methods study was conducted comprising semi-structured interviews and analysis of routinely collected data. Interviews were conducted with 6 clients and 35 stakeholders involved in program implementation. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis. Aboriginal Maternal and Infant Health Service Data Collection (AMDC) records for the period July 2012-June 2015 were investigated to examine how many eligible women attended a service implementing QFNL and how many women took up a QFNL support. Smoking cessation rates were compared in women attending a service offering QFNL with women attending the same service prior to the implementation of QFNL to determine program impact.
Results
QFNL was implemented in 70 services located in 13 LHDs across New South Wales. Over 430 staff attended QFNL training, including 101 staff in Aboriginal-identified roles. In the period July 2012-June 2015 27% (n = 1549) of eligible women attended a service implementing QFNL and 21% (n = 320) of these were recorded as taking up a QFNL support. While stakeholders shared stories of success, no statistically significant impact of QFNL on smoking cessation rates was identified (N = 3502; Odds ratio (OR) = 1.28; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.96–1.70; p-value = 0.0905). QFNL was acceptable to both clients and stakeholders, increased awareness about smoking cessation, and gave staff resources to support clients.
Conclusion
QFNL was perceived as acceptable by stakeholders and clients and provided care providers with knowledge and tangible support to offer women who presented at antenatal care as smokers, however, no statistically significant impact on rates of smoking cessation were found using the measures available.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s mothers and babies 2019: Web report 2021. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies/contents/antenatal-period/smoking-during-pregnancy. Accessed 14 Sept 2021.
2. Lumley J, Chamberlain C, Dowswell T, Oliver S, Oakley L, Watson L. Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(3):CD001055.
3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Pregnancy and birth outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women 2016–2018. Cat. No. IHW 234. Canberra: AIHW; 2021.
4. McInerney C, Ibiebele I, Ford JB, Randall D, Morris JM, Meharg D, et al. Benefits of not smoking during pregnancy for australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their babies: a retrospective cohort study using linked data. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e032763.
5. Rogers JM. Tobacco and pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol. 2009;28(2):152–60.