Author:
Guise Veslemøy,Chambers Mary,Lyng Hilda Bø,Haraldseid-Driftland Cecilie,Schibevaag Lene,Fagerdal Birte,Dombestein Heidi,Ree Eline,Wiig Siri
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Resilience in healthcare is the capacity to adapt to challenges and changes to maintain high-quality care across system levels. While healthcare system stakeholders such as patients, informal carers, healthcare professionals and service managers have all come to be acknowledged as important co-creators of resilient healthcare, our knowledge and understanding of who, how, and in which contexts different stakeholders come to facilitate and support resilience is still lacking. This study addresses gaps in the research by conducting a stakeholder analysis to identify and categorise the stakeholders that are key to facilitating and sustaining resilience in healthcare, and to investigate stakeholder relationships relevant for the enactment of resilient healthcare systems.
Methods
The stakeholder analysis was conducted using a sample of 19 empirical research projects. A narrative summary was written for 14 of the projects, based on publicly available material. In addition, 16 individual interviews were undertaken with researchers from the same sample of 19 projects. The 16 interview transcripts and 14 narratives made up the data material of the study. Application of stakeholder analysis methods was done in three steps: a) identification of stakeholders; b) differentiation and categorisation of stakeholders using an interest/influence grid; and c) investigation and mapping of stakeholder relationships using an actor-linkage matrix.
Results
Identified stakeholders were Patients, Family Carers, Healthcare Professionals, Ward/Unit Managers, Service or Case Managers, Regulatory Investigators, Policy Makers, and Other Service Providers. All identified stakeholders were categorised as either ‘Subjects’, ‘Players’, or ‘Context Setters’ according to their level of interest in and influence on resilient healthcare. Stakeholder relationships were mapped according to the degree and type of contact between the various groups of stakeholders involved in facilitating resilient healthcare, ranging from ‘Not linked’ to ‘Fully linked’.
Conclusion
Family carers and healthcare professionals were found to be the most active groups of stakeholders in the enactment of healthcare system resilience. Patients, managers, and policy makers also contribute to resilience to various degrees. Relationships between stakeholder groups are largely characterised by communication and coordination, in addition to formal collaborations where diverse actors work together to achieve common goals.
Funder
Norges Forskningsråd
University of Stavanger & Stavanger University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference83 articles.
1. Wiig S, Aase K, Billett S, Canfield C, Røise O, Njå O, Guise V, Haraldseid-Driftland C, Ree E, Anderson JE, et al. Defining the boundaries and operational concepts of resilience in the resilience in healthcare research program. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):330. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05224-3.
2. Hollnagel E, Wears RL, Braithwaite J. From safety-I to safety-II: a white paper. The Resilient Health Care Net: published simultaneously by the University of Southern Denmark University of Florida U, and Macquarie University, Australia; 2015.
https://www.england.nhs.uk/signuptosafety/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2015/10/safety-1-safety-2-whte-papr.pdf.
3. Lyng HB, Macrae C, Guise V, Haraldseid-Driftland C, Fagerdal B, Schibevaag L, Alsvik JG, Wiig S. Balancing adaptation and innovation for resilience in healthcare - a metasynthesis of narratives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):759. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06592-0.
4. Bergström J, van Winsen R, Henriqson E. On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: a literature review. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2015;141:131–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.008.
5. Guise V, Aase K, Chambers M, Canfield C, Wiig S. Patient and stakeholder involvement in resilient healthcare: an interactive research study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e049116. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049116.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献