Adaptation and psychometric testing of the end-of-life professional caregiver survey in Jamaica

Author:

Edwards Rebecca L.ORCID,Bakitas MarieORCID,Li PengORCID,Spence DingleORCID,Kahwa EulaliaORCID,Stoltenberg MarkORCID,Ivankova Nataliya V.ORCID,Thomas KaeshaORCID,Segree KammarORCID,Kodilinye Syed MatthewORCID,Markaki AdelaisORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundUsing a validated instrument to measure palliative care (PC) educational needs of health professionals is an important step in understanding how best to educate a well-versed PC workforce within a national health system. The End-of-life Professional Caregiver Survey (EPCS) was developed to measure U.S. interprofessional PC educational needs and has been validated for use in Brazil and China. As part of a larger research project, this study aimed to culturally adapt and psychometrically test the EPCS among physicians, nurses, and social workers practicing in Jamaica.MethodsFace validation involved expert review of the EPCS with recommendations for linguistic item modifications. Content validation was carried out by six Jamaica-based experts who completed a formal content validity index (CVI) for each EPCS item to ascertain relevancy. Health professionals practicing in Jamaica (n = 180) were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling to complete the updated 25-item EPCS (EPCS-J). Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s$$\alpha$$coefficient and McDonald’s$$\phi$$. Construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).ResultsContent validation led to elimination of three EPCS items based on a CVI < 0.78. Cronbach’s$$\alpha$$ranged from 0.83 to 0.91 and McDonald’s$$\phi$$ranged from 0.73 to 0.85 across EPCS-J subscales indicating good internal consistency reliability. The corrected item-total correlation for each EPCS-J item was > 0.30 suggesting good reliability. The CFA demonstrated a three-factor model with acceptable fit indices (RMSEA = 0.08, CFI = 0.88, SRMR = 0.06). The EFA determined a three-factor model had the best model fit, with four items moved into theeffective patient caresubscale from the other two EPCS-J subscales based on factor loading.ConclusionsThe psychometric properties of the EPCS-J resulted in acceptable levels of reliability and validity indicating that this instrument is suitable for use in measuring interprofessional PC educational needs in Jamaica.

Funder

American Cancer Society

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference33 articles.

1. World Health Organization. WHO definition of palliative care. [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2020 Feb 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/palliative-care.

2. Center to Advance Palliative Care. About palliative care [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 7]. Available from: https://www.capc.org/about/palliative-care/.

3. United Nations. General Assembly Resolution 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, USA: United Nations; 2015.

4. Plianbangchang S. Universal health coverage (UHC). JHR 2018 Aug 3;32(4):322–4.

5. Connor SR. Global Atlas of Palliative Care [Internet]. 2nd ed. Worldwide Hospice Palliative Care Alliance; 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 30]. Available from: http://www.thewhpca.org/resources/global-atlas-on-end-of-life-care.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3