Author:
Viottini Elena,Politano Gianfranco,Fornero Giulio,Pavanelli Pier Luigi,Borelli Paola,Bonaudo Marco,Gianino Maria Michela
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The paper aims to describe the 3-year incidence (2015/17) of aggressive acts against all healthcare workers to identify risk factors associated to violence among a variety of demographic and professional determinants of assaulted, and risk factors related to the circumstances surrounding these events.
Methods
A retrospective observational study of all 10,970 health workers in a large-sized Italian university hospital was performed.
The data, obtained from the “Aggression Reporting Form”, which must be completed by assaulted workers within 72 h of aggression, were collected for the following domains: worker assaulted (sex, age class, years worked); profession (nurses, medical doctors, non-medical support staff, administrative staff, midwives); aggressive acts (activity type during aggressive acts, season, time and location of aggressive acts); and type of aggressive acts (verbal, non-verbal, consequences, aggressors).
Results
Three hundred sixty-four (3.3%) workers experienced almost one aggression. The majority of the assaulted workers were female (77.5%), had worked for 6/15 years and were Nurses (64.3%). The majority of aggressive acts occurred during assistance and patient care (38.2%), in the spring and during the afternoon/morning shifts and took place in locations where patients were present (47.3%). The most prevalent aggression type was verbal (76.9%). The patient was the most common aggressor (46.7%). 56% of those assaulted experienced interruptions in their work.
Being female, being < 50 years of age, having worked for 6–15 years were significant risk factors for aggression. Midwives suffered the highest risk of experiencing aggression (RR = 12.95).
The risk analysis showed that non-verbally aggressive acts were related to assistance and patient care with respect to activity type, to the presence of patients and during the spring and afternoon/evening.
Conclusions
The findings suggest the parallel use of future qualitative studies to clarify the motivation behind aggression. These suggestions are needed for the implementation of additional adequate prevention strategies on either an organizational or a personal level.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Camerino D, Estryn-Behar M, Conway PM, van Der Heijden BIJM, Hasselhorn H-M. Work-related factors and violence among nursing staff in the European NEXT study: a longitudinal cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(1):35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.013.
2. Cannavò M, Fusaro N, Colaiuda F, Rescigno G, Fioravanti M. Violence on health care workers: Studio preliminare sulla presenza e la rilevanza della violenza nei confronti del personale sanitario dell’emergenza. La Clinica Terapeutica. 2017;168(2):e99–e112.
3. CDC. 2014. “Occupational Traumatic Injuries Among Workers in Health Care Facilities,”. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6415a2.htm. [Accessed on 2 Sept 2018].
4. Commissione delle Comunità Europee. 2007. “Accordo Quadro Del 26 Aprile 2007 Sulle Molestie e La Violenza Sul Luogo Di Lavoro,”. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52007DC0686. [Accessed on 2 Sept 2018].
5. Dressner, M. A. 2017. “Hospital workers: an assessment of occupational injuries and illnesses : monthly labor review,” U.S. bureau of labor statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2017/article/hospital-workers-an-assessment-of-occupational-injuries-and-illnesses.htm. [Accessed on 2 Sept 2018].
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献