Author:
Odendaal Willem,Chetty Terusha,Tomlinson Mark,Goga Ameena,Singh Yages,Kauchali Shuaib,Marshall Carol,Hunt Xanthe
Abstract
AbstractThe South African National Department of Health developed a quality improvement (QI) programme to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality and still births. The programme was implemented between 2018 and 2022 in 21 purposively selected public health facilities. We conducted a process evaluation to describe the characteristics and skills of the QI team leaders of well-performing teams. The evaluation was conducted in 15 of the 21 facilities. Facilities were purposively selected and comprised semi-structured interviews with leaders at three time points; reviewing of QI documentation; and 37 intermittently conducted semi-structured interviews with the QI advisors, being QI technical experts who supported the teams. These interviews focused on participants’ experiences and perceptions of how the teams performed, and performance barriers and enablers. Thematic data analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti. Variation in team performance was associated with leaders’ attributes and skills. However, the COVID-19 pandemic also affected team functioning. Well-performing teams had leaders who effectively navigated COVID-19 and other challenges, who embraced QI and had sound QI skills. These leaders cultivated trust by taking responsibility for failures, correcting members’ mistakes in encouraging ways, and setting high standards of care. Moreover, they promoted programme ownership among members by delegating tasks. Given the critical role leaders play in team performance and thus in the outcomes of QI programmes, efforts should focus on leader selection, training, and support.
Funder
South African Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Backhouse A, Ogunlayi F. Quality improvement into practice. BMJ. 2020;368:1–26.
2. World Health Organization. Improving the quality of care for mothers, newborns and children in health facilities: learner manual. Version 3. New Delhi: World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2020.
3. Garcia-Elorrio E, Rowe SY, Teijeiro ME, Ciapponi A, Rowe AK. The effectiveness of the quality improvement collaborative strategy in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0221919.
4. Hutchinson E, Nayiga S, Nabirye C, Taaka L, Westercamp N, Rowe AK, et al. Opening the ‘Black Box’ of collaborative improvement: a qualitative evaluation of a pilot intervention to improve quality of malaria surveillance data in public health centres in Uganda. Malar J. 2021;20(1):1–14.
5. Itri JN, Bakow E, Probyn L, Kadom N, Duong PAT, Gettle LM, et al. The science of quality improvement. Academic Radiology. 2017;24(3):253–62.