Author:
Zhao Yingying,He Liqing,Hu Juan,Zhao Jing,Li Mingxuan,Huang Lisha,Jin Qiu,Wang Lan,Wang Jianxiong
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We aimed to establish simplified and quantifiable triage criteria in pediatric emergency care, improving the efficiency of pediatric emergency triage and ensuring patient safety.
Methods
We preliminarily determined the pediatric emergency triage criteria with references to pediatric emergency department characteristics and internationally recognized triage tools after literature review and discussion. The final determination of the triage criteria was reached after two rounds of Delphi surveys completed by18 experts from 3 hospitals in China.
Results
Both round 1 and round 2 surveys had a 100% response rate. The overall expert authority coefficient in the two rounds of surveys was 0.872. The experts had 100% enthusiasm for participating in the surveys. Kendall’s coefficients of concordance for conditions/symptoms in patients triaged to level 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0.149, 0.193, 0.102, and 0.266, respectively. All p-values were less than 0.05. The coefficients of variation in conditions/symptoms, vital signs, and the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) ranged between 0.00 and 0.205, meeting the inclusion criteria. The pediatric emergency triage criteria containing conditions/symptoms, vital signs, PEWS scores, and other 4 level 1 indicators, 51 level 2 indicators and 23 level 3 indicators were built. The maximum waiting time to treatment for the patients triaged to level 1, 2, 3, and 4 was immediate, within 10 min, within 30 min, and within 240 min, respectively.
Conclusion
The pediatric emergency triage criteria established in this study was scientific and reliable. It can be used to quickly identify the patients requiring urgent and immediate care, thereby ensuring the priorities for the care of critically ill patients.
Funder
Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Fernandez A, Benito J, Mintegi S. Is this child sick? Usefulness of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle in emergency settings. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017;93(Suppl 1):60–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2017.07.002.
2. Beck N, Michel M, Binder E, Kapelari K, Maurer M, LLamina C, et al. The Manchester Triage System in a pediatric emergency department of an Austrian university hospital: a retrospective analysis of urgency levels. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022;38(2):e639–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002482.
3. The National Pediatric Emergency Status Investigation Group. Current situation of pediatric emergency in tertiary and teaching hospitals in 15 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions in China Mainland. Chin J Pediatr. 2014;52(12):913–7.
4. Shen X, Jin J, Huang G, Jiang C, Lou Q, Qian L, et al. The establishment of paediatric triage scale. Chin J Emerg Med. 2019;28(12):1553–6. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.12.020.
5. Yang Y. Developing and applications of pediatric emergency triage system [master’s dissertation]. Fuzhou: Fujian Medical University; 2014.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献