Author:
Manhas Kiran Pohar,Brehon Katelyn,Jiang Jennis,Damji Karim F.,Costello Fiona
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Post-stroke visual impairment (VI) is a common but under-recognized care challenge. Common manifestations of post-stroke VI include: diplopia, homonymous hemianopia, oscillopsia secondary to nystagmus, and visual inattention or neglect. In acute care settings, post-stroke VI recognition and treatment are often sub-optimal as emphasis is placed on survival. Stroke survivors with VI often face inconsistencies when accessing care out of hospital because variable availability and subsidization of visual rehabilitation. We sought to identify gaps in care experienced by stroke survivors with VI from stroke survivors’ and care providers’ perspectives.
Methods
We conducted a qualitative description study across 12 care sites in Alberta, Canada, using semi-structured interviews. Survivor interviews focused on the health system experience. Provider interviews discussed approaches to care, perceived gaps, and current resources. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Iterative content analysis was completed using NVivo 12. We promoted rigour through an audit trail, open-ended questions, thick description, and collaborative coding.
Results
We completed 50 interviews: 19 survivor interviews and 31 provider interviews. The majority of survivors were male (n = 14) and recruited from community settings (n = 16). Providers varied in profession and location within the care continuum. Two key themes emerged from the provider and survivor interviews pertaining to (a) facets of visual rehabilitation (sub-themes: access, resources, and multidisciplinary professional interaction); and (b) functioning with post-stroke VI (sub-themes: early experiences post-stroke and living with VI in the real world).
Conclusions
The visual rehabilitation model needs to be optimized to ensure transparent inter-disciplinary communication and efficient referral pathways. Future research will focus on evaluating the effectiveness of post-stroke care from multiple perspectives in Alberta.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Katan M, Luft A. Global Burden of Stroke. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(2):208–11.
2. Information CIfH. Improved stroke data means better care and outcomes for patients: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2021 [Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/en/improved-stroke-data-means-better-care-and-outcomes-for-patients. Accessed 1 Mar 2022.
3. Khan S, Leung E, Jay WM. Stroke and visual rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(1):27–36.
4. Rowe FJ, Hepworth LR, Kirkham JJ. Development of core outcome sets for vision screening and assessment in stroke: A Delphi and consensus study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):1–10.
5. Luu S, Lee AW, Daly A, Chen CS. Visual field defects after stroke–a practical guide for GPs. Aust Fam Physician. 2010;39(7):499–503.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献