Author:
Ruseckaite Rasa,Maharaj Ashika D.,Dean Joanne,Krysinska Karolina,Ackerman Ilana N.,Brennan Angela L.,Busija Ljoudmila,Carter Helen,Earnest Arul,Forrest Christopher B.,Harris Ian A.,Sansoni Janet,Ahern Susannah
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Clinical quality registries (CQRs) monitor compliance against optimal practice and provide feedback to the clinical community and wider stakeholder groups. Despite a number of CQRs having incorporated the patient perspective to support the evaluation of healthcare delivery, no recommendations for inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in CQRs exist. The aim of this study was to develop a core set of recommendations for PROMs inclusion of in CQRs.
Method
An online two-round Delphi survey was performed among CQR data custodians, quality of life researchers, biostatisticians and clinicians largely recruited in Australia. A list of statements for the recommendations was identified from a literature and survey of the Australian registries conducted in 2019. The statements were grouped into the following domains: rationale, setting, ethics, instrument, administration, data management, statistical methods, and feedback and reporting. Eighteen experts were invited to participate, 11 agreed to undertake the first online survey (round 1). Of these, nine experts completed the online survey for round 2.
Results
From 117 statements presented to the Delphi panel in round 1, a total of 72 recommendations (55 from round 1 and 17 from round 2) with median importance (MI) ≥ 7 and disagreement index (DI) < 1 were proposed for inclusion into the final draft set and were reviewed by the project team. Recommendations were refined for clarity and to read as stand-alone statements. Ten overlapped conceptually and, therefore, were merged to reduce repetition. The final 62 recommendations were sent for review to the panel members for their feedback, which was incorporated into the final set.
Conclusion
This is the first study to develop preliminary recommendations for PROMs inclusion in CQRs. Recommendations for PROMs implementation are critically important for registries to assure meaningful PROMs data capture, use, interpretation, and reporting to improve health outcomes and healthcare value.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Williams K, Sansoni J, Morris D, Grootemaat P. Patient-reported outcome measures: Literature review. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2016. https://www.safetyandqualitygovau/sites/default/files/migrated/PROMs-stakeholder-interviews-report-2018pdf
2. Corbalan R, Bassand JP, Illingworth L, Ambrosio G, Camm AJ, Fitzmaurice DA, et al. Analysis of outcomes in ischemic vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the GARFIELD-AF registry. JAMA Cardiol. 2019.
3. Value in Healthcare Laying the Foundation for Health System Transformation, World Economic Forum, Geneva. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Insight_Report_Value_Healthcare_Laying_Foundation.pdf. 2017.
4. Wilcox N, McNeil JJ. Clinical quality registries have the potential to drive improvements in the appropriateness of care. Med J Aust. 2016;205(10):S27–S9. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja15.00921.
5. Danek E, Earnest A, Wischer N, Andrikopoulos S, Pease A, Nanayakkara N, et al. Risk-adjustment of diabetes health outcomes improves the accuracy of performance benchmarking. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28101-w.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献