Author:
Nuijten Mark,Van Wilder Philippe
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Innovative orphan drugs often have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) which is higher than the maximum threshold for reimbursement. Payers have limited budgets and often cannot pay the full price of a new product, but pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies require a minimum price to satisfy their investors. The objective of this study was to present a possible solution to bridge this pricing gap by having early phase price agreements, which reduce the risk for investors.
Methods
We used a Pricing Model, which determines the minimum (break-even) price of an innovative drug from an investor’s perspective. This model is based on economic valuation theory, which uses the expected free cash flows and the required cost of capital. We selected two orphan drugs with a positive clinical assessment and an ICER higsher than the Dutch maximum threshold of €80,000 per QALY gained to use as examples in the model: Spinraza for spinal muscular atrophy and Orkambi for cystic fibrosis.
RESULTS: The results show that early pricing agreements before phase III trials can substantially lower the drug price resulting from a lower cost of capital. The minimum price for orphan drugs can be reduced by 27.4%, when cost of capital decreases from 12 to 9%. An additional adjustment of other critical parameters due to early pricing agreements (lower probabilities of phase III failure and lower research and development (R&D) costs) can further reduce the minimal price by 62.8%.
Conclusion
This study shows that earlier timing of price negotiations resulting in an agreement on drug price can substantially lower the minimal price of orphan drugs for the investor.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference13 articles.
1. Reckers V, van Exel NJA, Brouwer WBF. Looking back and moving forward: on the application of proportional shortfall in healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2018;122(6):621–9.
2. Nuijten M, Vis J. Economic comments on proposal for a novel cancer drug pricing model. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(9):587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-018-0083-2.
3. Herbeoordeling lumacaftor/ivacaftor (Orkambi). 2016. Reference 2016136882.Zorginstituut Nederland. https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/publicaties/adviezen/2016/12/15/gvs-advies-lumacaftor-ivacaftor-orkambi-bij-cystische-fibrose-cf-bij-patienten-van-12-jaar-en-ouder-die-homozygoot-zijn-voor-de-f508del-mutatie-in-het-cftr-gen-herbeoordeling.
4. Sloand J. Assessing the financial viability of stratified medicine using decision tree analysis. Working paper. Bethlehem: Lehigh University; 2014.
5. Nuijten M, Fugel HJ, Vis J. Evaluation and valuation of the price of expensive medicinal products: application of the discounted cash flow to orphan drugs. J Rare Dis Disord. 2018;1:005 Volume 1 | Issue 1.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献