The impact of early phase price agreements on prices of orphan drugs

Author:

Nuijten Mark,Van Wilder Philippe

Abstract

Abstract Background Innovative orphan drugs often have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) which is higher than the maximum threshold for reimbursement. Payers have limited budgets and often cannot pay the full price of a new product, but pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies require a minimum price to satisfy their investors. The objective of this study was to present a possible solution to bridge this pricing gap by having early phase price agreements, which reduce the risk for investors. Methods We used a Pricing Model, which determines the minimum (break-even) price of an innovative drug from an investor’s perspective. This model is based on economic valuation theory, which uses the expected free cash flows and the required cost of capital. We selected two orphan drugs with a positive clinical assessment and an ICER higsher than the Dutch maximum threshold of €80,000 per QALY gained to use as examples in the model: Spinraza for spinal muscular atrophy and Orkambi for cystic fibrosis. RESULTS: The results show that early pricing agreements before phase III trials can substantially lower the drug price resulting from a lower cost of capital. The minimum price for orphan drugs can be reduced by 27.4%, when cost of capital decreases from 12 to 9%. An additional adjustment of other critical parameters due to early pricing agreements (lower probabilities of phase III failure and lower research and development (R&D) costs) can further reduce the minimal price by 62.8%. Conclusion This study shows that earlier timing of price negotiations resulting in an agreement on drug price can substantially lower the minimal price of orphan drugs for the investor.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference13 articles.

1. Reckers V, van Exel NJA, Brouwer WBF. Looking back and moving forward: on the application of proportional shortfall in healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2018;122(6):621–9.

2. Nuijten M, Vis J. Economic comments on proposal for a novel cancer drug pricing model. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(9):587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-018-0083-2.

3. Herbeoordeling lumacaftor/ivacaftor (Orkambi). 2016. Reference 2016136882.Zorginstituut Nederland. https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/publicaties/adviezen/2016/12/15/gvs-advies-lumacaftor-ivacaftor-orkambi-bij-cystische-fibrose-cf-bij-patienten-van-12-jaar-en-ouder-die-homozygoot-zijn-voor-de-f508del-mutatie-in-het-cftr-gen-herbeoordeling.

4. Sloand J. Assessing the financial viability of stratified medicine using decision tree analysis. Working paper. Bethlehem: Lehigh University; 2014.

5. Nuijten M, Fugel HJ, Vis J. Evaluation and valuation of the price of expensive medicinal products: application of the discounted cash flow to orphan drugs. J Rare Dis Disord. 2018;1:005 Volume 1 | Issue 1.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Valuation of Medical Innovation Handling with Uncertainty and Risk;Journal of Market Access & Health Policy;2024-08-01

2. Concept—Integrated Valuation Model;Journal of Financial Risk Management;2024

3. Valuation of Treatments for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review of Societal Preference Studies;Advances in Therapy;2022-12-01

4. Pricing Zolgensma – the world’s most expensive drug;Journal of Market Access & Health Policy;2021-12-29

5. Early drug pricing agreements lower break-even price of orphan drugs;PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News;2021-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3