Author:
Dolber Trygve,Muskin Ryan,Runnels Patrick
Abstract
Abstract
Background
5% of patients account for the majority of healthcare spend, but standardized interventions for this complex population struggle to generate return on investment. The aim of this study is the development and proof of concept of an adaptive intervention to reduce cost and risk of readmission for medically high-risk individuals with any behavioral health diagnosis.
Methods
A behaviorally-oriented, personalized care service was delivered using a consultative, team-based approach including a physician, counselor, dietitian and social worker in collaboration with nurse care coordinators. Iterative re-conceptualizations informed tailored treatment approaches to prevent acute decompensation while retraining behaviors that impeded recovery. This service was offered to a small set of members of the employee health plan at University Hospitals Cleveland with an existing behavioral health disorder from November of 2020 to March of 2023. 26 members receiving the service were identified and matched with 26 controls using a risk algorithm. Members and controls were then classified as high utilizers (n = 14) or standard utilizers (n = 38) based on utilization claims data.
Results
Primary outcomes of this study included medical expenditures (delineated as planned and unplanned spend) and readmission risk scores. Compared to risk-matched controls, both planned and unplanned health care expenditures significantly decreased (p < .05) for 7 high utilizers, and unplanned spend only significantly decreased for 19 standard utilizers (p < .05). Risk scores, which predict future spend, decreased significantly for standard utilizers (p < .05), but not for high utilizers.
Discussion
The value of a behaviorally-oriented personalized care intervention for medically high-risk patients in a commercial insurance population was demonstrated through decreased spend for high utilizers and decreased risk for standard utilizers. Further expansion, refinement, evaluation and scaling are warranted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. National Academy of Medicine. In: Finkelman EM, McGinnis JM, McClellan MB, Dzau VJ, editors. Vital Directions for Health & Health Care: an Initiative of the National Academy of Medicine. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017.
2. Finkelstein A, Zhou A, Taubman S, Doyle J. Health care hotspotting ’ a randomized, controlled trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(2):152–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1906848.
3. Williams BC. Limited effects of Care Management for High Utilizers on Total Healthcare costs. Published online 2015.
4. DuBard CA, Jackson CT. Active redesign of a Medicaid Care Management Strategy for Greater Return on Investment: Predicting Impactability. Popul Health Manag. 2018;21(2):102–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2017.0122.
5. Brown DM, Hernandez EA, Levin S, et al. Effect of Social needs Case Management on Hospital Use among Adult Medicaid beneficiaries a Randomized Study. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(8):1109–17. https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-0074.