Protocol for an economic evaluation of a tele-neurologic intervention alongside a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NeTKoH)
-
Published:2023-09-22
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-6963
-
Container-title:BMC Health Services Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Health Serv Res
Author:
Gonçalves Ana S. OliveiraORCID, Mayer ImkeORCID, Schulz Ricarda S.ORCID, Flöel AgnesORCID, von Podewils FelixORCID, Angermaier AnselmORCID, Wainwright KerstinORCID, Kurth TobiasORCID, Filser Paula J., Alkhayer Aiham, Horn Verena, Köhn Wieland, Kotarz-Boettcher Malgorzata, Krüger Anne, Weil Cordula, Witt Carl, Chenot Jean-Francois, Kiel Simone, Michalowsky Elisa, Böttcher Michael, Graja Diana, Reber Katrin C., Resch Olga, Rothe Juliane, Syring Jacqueline,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A significant and growing portion of the global burden of diseases is caused by neurological disorders. Tele-neurology has the potential to improve access to health care services and the quality of care, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The economic evaluation of the stepped wedge randomised controlled trial NeTKoH aims to ascertain the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility regarding the effects of a tele-neurologic intervention in primary care in a rural area in Germany.
Methods
This protocol outlines the methods used when conducting the trial-based economic evaluation of NeTKoH. The outcomes used in our economic analysis are all prespecified endpoints of the NeTKoH trial. Outcomes considered for the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will be quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, proportion of neurologic problems being solved at the GP’s office (primary outcome), hospital length-of-stay and number of hospital stays. Costs will be prospectively collected during the trial by the participating statutory health insurances, and will be analysed from a statutory health insurance perspective within the German health care system. This economic evaluation will be reported complying with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.
Discussion
This within-trial economic evaluation relaying the costs and outcomes of an interdisciplinary tele-consulting intervention will provide high-quality evidence for cost-effectiveness and policy implications of a tele-neurological programme, including the potential for application in other rural areas in Germany or other jurisdictions with a comparable health system.
Trial registration
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024492), date registered: September 28, 2021.
Funder
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:459–80. 2. Deuschl G, Beghi E, Fazekas F, Varga T, Christoforidi KA, Sipido E, et al. The burden of neurological diseases in Europe: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Public Health. 2020;5:e551–67. 3. Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen H-U, Jönsson B, CDBE2010 study group, et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:155–62. 4. Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung. Versichertenbefragung der Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung 2020 n.d. https://www.kbv.de/media/sp/Berichtband_Ergebnisse_KBV_Versichertenbefragung_2020.pdf (accessed March 21, 2022). 5. Feldmeier G, Löffler C, Altiner A, Wollny A, von Podewils F, Ritzke M. Audiovisual teleconsultation for patients with epilepsy in primary care in rural Germany: a pilot study on feasibility and acceptance. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022;8:213.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|