Author:
Schots M. A. S.,Coleman H. L. S.,Lutwama G. W.,Straetemans M.,Jacobs E.
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundIndirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on communities in fragile and conflict-affected settings may be severe due to reduced access and use of healthcare, as happened during the 2015 Ebola Virus Disease outbreak. Achieving a balance between short-term emergency response and addressing long-term health needs is particularly challenging in fragile and conflict-affected settings such as South Sudan, given the already significant barriers to accessing healthcare for the population. This study sought to characterise the effect of COVID-19 on healthcare access and South Sudan’s healthcare response. This can inform efforts to mitigate the potential impacts of COVID-19 or other epidemiological threats, and contribute to understanding how these may be balanced for greater health system resilience in fragile contexts.MethodsWe conducted a mixed methods study in three of South Sudan’s states, combining data from a cross-sectional quantitative household survey with qualitative interviews and Focus Group Discussions.ResultsEven though some fears related to COVID-19 were reported, we found these did not greatly dissuade people from seeking care and do not yield significant consequences for health system programming in South Sudan. The pillars of the response focused on risk communication and community engagement were effective in reaching communities through different channels. Respondents and participants reported behaviour changes that were in line with public health advice. We also found that the implementation of COVID-19 response activities sometimes created frictions between the national government and international health actors, and that COVID-19 caused a greater reliance on, and increased responsibility for, international donors for health planning.ConclusionsGiven the fact that global priorities on COVID-19 are greatly shifting, power dynamics between international health agencies and the national government may be useful to consider in further COVID-19 planning, particularly for the vaccine roll-out. South Sudan must now navigate a period of transition where COVID-19 vaccine roll-out continues and other domestic health burdens are re-prioritised.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Chi Y-L, Regan L, Nemzoff C, Krubiner C, Anwar Y, Walker D. Beyond COVID-19: A Whole of Health Look at Impacts During the Pandemic Response. Vol. 416, DC. 2020 [cited 15 Feb 2021]. Available from: www.cgdev.org
2. Krubiner C, Keller JM, Kaufman J. Balancing the COVID-19 Response with Wider Health Needs: Key Decision-Making Considerations for Low- and Middle-Income Countries. 2020.
3. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Vol. 20, The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Lancet Publishing Group; 2020 [cited 19 May 2022]. p. 533–4. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1473309920301201/fulltext
4. Kieny MP, Dovlo D. Beyond Ebola: A new agenda for resilient health systems. Lancet. 2015[cited 19 Feb 2021];385(9963):91–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62479-X/
5. Nam SL, Blanchet K. We mustn’t forget other essential health services during the Ebola crisis. BMJ (Online). 2014 Nov 18 [cited 19 Feb 2021]; Available from: https://www-bmj-com.proxy.library.uu.nl/content/349/bmj.g6837
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献