Abstract
Abstract
Background
Research capacity strengthening could be an indirect outcome of implementing a research project. The objective of this study was to explore the ability of the global maternal sepsis study (GLOSS), implemented in 52 countries, to develop and strengthen sexual and reproductive health research capacity of local participants in low- and middle- income participating countries.
Methods
We carried out a qualitative study employing grounded theory in sixteen countries in Africa and Latin America. We used inductive and deductive methods through a focus group discussion and semi-structured interviews for the emergence of themes. Participants of the focus group discussion (n = 8) were GLOSS principal investigators (PIs) in Latin America. Interviewees (n = 63) were selected by the country GLOSS PIs in both Africa and Latin America, and included a diverse sample of participants involved in different aspects of study implementation. Eighty-two percent of the participants were health workers. We developed a conceptual framework that took into consideration data obtained from the focus group and refined it based on data from the interviews.
Results
Six themes emerged from the data analysis: recognized need for research capacity, unintended effects of participating in research, perceived ownership and linkage with the research study, being just data collectors, belonging to an institution that supports and fosters research, and presenting study results back to study implementers. Research capacity strengthening needs were consistently highlighted including involvement in protocol development, training and technical support, data analysis, and project management. The need for institutional support for researchers to conduct research was also emphasised.
Conclusion
This study suggests that research capacity strengthening of local researchers was an unintentional outcome of the large multi-country study on maternal sepsis. However, for sustainable research capacity to be built, study coordinators and funders need to deliberately plan for it, addressing needs at both the individual and institutional level.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Research for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 146. https://www.who.int/whr/2013/report/en/ Accessed 17 Nov 2019
2. World Health Organization. Report from the ministerial summit on Health Research: identify challenges, inform actions, correct inequities. Mexico City: World Health Organization; 2005. http://www.who.int/rpc/summit/documents/summit_report_final2.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2019
3. ESSENCE on Health Research. Planning, monitoring and evaluation: framework for research capacity strengthening. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Revision. [Online] Available at:http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/Essence_frwk_2016_web.pdf. [Accessed 06/11/2019]
4. Lansang MA, Dennis R. Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(10):764–70.
5. Dean L, Gregorius S, Bates I, Pulford J. Advancing the science of health research capacity strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the published literature, 2000–2016. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018718.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献