Author:
Corry Dagmar Anna S.,Carter Gillian,Doyle Frank,Fahey Tom,Gillespie Patrick,McGlade Kieran,O’Halloran Peter,O’Neill Nina,Wallace Emma,Brazil Kevin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Aging populations present a challenge to health systems internationally, due to the increasing complexity of care for older adults living with functional decline. This study aimed to elicit expert views of key health professionals on effective and sustainable implementation of a nurse-led, person-centred anticipatory care planning (ACP) intervention for older adults at risk of functional decline in a primary care setting.
Methods
We examined the feasibility of an ACP intervention in a trans-jurisdictional feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial consisting of home visits by research nurses who assessed participants’ health, discussed their health goals and devised an anticipatory care plan following consultation with participants’ GPs and adjunct clinical pharmacist. As part of the project, we elicited the views and recommendations of experienced key health professionals working with the target population who were recruited using a ‘snowballing technique’ in cooperation with older people health networks in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI), United Kingdom [n = 16: 7 ROI, 9 NI]. Following receipt of written information about the intervention and the provision of informed consent, the health professionals were interviewed to determine their expert views on the feasibility of the ACP intervention and recommendations for successful implementation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
The ACP intervention was perceived to be beneficial for most older patients with multimorbidity. Effective and sustainable implementation was said to be facilitated by accurate and timely patient selection, GP buy-in, use of existing structures within health systems, multidisciplinary and integrated working, ACP nurse training, as well as patient health literacy. Barriers emerged as significant work already undertaken, increasing workload, lack of time, funding and resources, fragmented services, and geographical inequalities.
Conclusions
The key health professionals perceived the ACP intervention to be highly beneficial to patients, with significant potential to prevent or avoid functional decline and hospital admissions. They suggested that successful implementation of this primary care based, whole-person approach would involve integrated and multi-disciplinary working, GP buy in, patient health education, and ACP nurse training. The findings have potential implications for a full trial, and patient care and health policy.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03902743. Registered on 4 April 2019.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Hajat C, Stein E. The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: a narrative review. Prev Med Rep. 2018;12:284–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008.
2. World Health Organisation. Global Health and Aging. 2011. https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf.
3. Colombo F, García-Goñi M, Schwierz C. Addressing multimorbidity to improve healthcare and economic sustainability. J Comorb. 2016;6(1):21–7. https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.74.
4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Chronic care: making the casefor ongoing care. 2010. http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2010/rwjf54583.
5. National Voices, People Shaping Health and Social Care. Person-centred Care 2020: Calls and contributions from Health andSocial Care Charities. 2014. https://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/public/publications/person-centred-care-2020.pdf.