Health systems challenges, mitigation strategies and adaptations to maintain essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: learnings from the six geopolitical regions in Nigeria
-
Published:2024-05-14
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-6963
-
Container-title:BMC Health Services Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Health Serv Res
Author:
Bello Segun,Neill Rachel,Jegede Ayodele S,Bamgboye Eniola A.,Salawu Mobolaji M.,Afolabi Rotimi Felix,Nzelu Charles,Azodo Ngozi,Adoghe Anthony,Ogunlayi Munirat,Yaradua Saudatu Umma,Wang William,Liu Anne,Fawole Olufunmilayo I.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic control strategies disrupted the smooth delivery of essential health services (EHS) globally. Limited evidence exists on the health systems lens approach to analyzing the challenges encountered in maintaining EHS during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to identify the health system challenges encountered and document the mitigation strategies and adaptations made across geopolitical zones (GPZs) in Nigeria.
Methods
The national qualitative survey of key actors across the six GPZs in Nigeria involved ten states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) which were selected based on resilience, COVID-19 burden and security considerations. A pre-tested key informant guide was used to collect data on service utilization, changes in service utilization, reasons for changes in primary health centres’ (PHCs) service volumes, challenges experienced by health facilities in maintaining EHS, mitigation strategies implemented and adaptations to service delivery. Emerging sub-themes were categorized under the appropriate pillars of the health system.
Results
A total of 22 respondents were interviewed. The challenges experienced in maintaining EHS cut across the pillars of the health systems including: Human resources shortage, shortages in the supply of personal protective equipments, fear of contracting COVID-19 among health workers misconception, ignorance, socio-cultural issues, lockdown/transportation and lack of equipment/waiting area (. The mitigation strategies included improved political will to fund health service projects, leading to improved accessibility, affordability, and supply of consumables. The health workforce was motivated by employing, redeploying, training, and incentivizing. Service delivery was reorganized by rescheduling appointments and prioritizing some EHS such as maternal and childcare. Sustainable systems adaptations included IPC and telehealth infrastructure, training and capacity building, virtual meetings and community groups set up for sensitization and engagement.
Conclusion
The mitigation strategies and adaptations implemented were important contributors to EHS recovery especially in the high resilience LGAs and have implications for future epidemic preparedness plans.
Funder
Gates Ventures
Global Financing Facility for Women, Children, and Adolescents
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. World Health Organisation. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard 2023 [Available from: https://covid19.who.int/?adgroupsurvey={adgroupsurvey}&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIipeAwN2z_QIVR5nVCh2YbAfwEAAYASABEgIlr_D_BwE.
2. World Health Organisation. COVID-19: operational guidance for maintaining essential health services during an outbreak: interim guidance, 25 March 2020 2020 [ https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331561.
3. Low BCY, Yap-Tan P. Countermeasures for Health Care disruptions during Lockdowns. Disaster Med Pub Health Prep. 2022;17:e106.
4. Arsenault C, Gage A, Kim MK, Kapoor NR, Akweongo P, Amponsah F, et al. COVID-19 and resilience of healthcare systems in ten countries. Nat Med. 2022;28(6):1314–24.
5. Androutsou L, Latsou D, Geitona M. Health systems’ challenges and responses for recovery in the pre and Post COVID-19 era. J Service Managemen. 2021;14:444–60.