Author:
Etherington Cole,Kitto Simon,Burns Joseph K.,Adams Tracey L.,Birze Arija,Britton Meghan,Singh Sukhbir,Boet Sylvain
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite substantial implications for healthcare provider practice and patient outcomes, gender has yet to be systematically explored with regard to interprofessional operating room (OR) teamwork. We aimed to explore and describe how gender and additional social identity factors shape experiences and perceptions of teamwork in the OR.
Methods
This study was a qualitative secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews with OR team members conducted between November 2018 and July 2019. Participants were recruited across hospitals in Ontario, Canada. We conducted both purposive and snowball sampling until data saturation was reached. Transcripts were analyzed thematically by two independent research team members, moving from open to axial coding.
Results
Sixty-six interviews of OR healthcare professionals were completed: anesthesia (n=17), nursing (n=19), perfusion (n=2), and surgery (n=26). Traditional gender roles, norms, and stereotypes were perceived and experienced by both women and men, but with different consequences. Both women and men participants described challenges that women face in the OR, such as being perceived negatively for displaying leadership behaviours. Participants also reported that interactions and behaviours vary depending on the team gender composition, and that other social identities, such as age and race, often interact with gender. Nevertheless, participants indicated a belief that the influence of gender in the OR may be modified.
Conclusions
The highly gendered reality of the OR creates an environment conducive to breakdowns in communuication and patient safety risks in addition to diminishing team morale, psychological safety, and provider well-being. Consequently, until teamwork interventions adequately account for gender, they are unlikely to be optimally effective or sustainable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, de Keizer B, et al. The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies. Patient Saf Surg. 2011;5:1–11.
2. Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197:678–85.
3. The Joint Commission. Sentinel event data: root causes by event type 2004-2015. Available from URL: https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/patient-safety-topics/sentinel-event/sentinel-event-data%2D%2D%2D%2Devent-type-by-year/ (accessed (November, 2020)).
4. Catchpole KR, Giddings AEB, Wilkinson M, Hirst G, Dale T, de Leval MR. Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. Surg (United States). 2007;142:102–10.
5. Weller J, Boyd M. Making a difference through improving teamwork in the operating room: a systematic review of the evidence on what works. Curr Anaesthesiol Rep. 2014;4:77–83.