Author:
Viswanath Mallaika,Clinch Darja,Ceresoli Marco,Dhesi Jugdeep,D’Oria Mario,De Simone Belinda,Podda Mauro,Di Saverio Salomone,Coccolini Federico,Sartelli Massimo,Catena Fausto,Moore Ernest,Rangar Deepa,Biffl Walter L.,Damaskos Dimitrios
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Frailty is associated with poor post-operative outcomes in emergency surgical patients. Shared multidisciplinary models have been developed to provide a holistic, reactive model of care to improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to describe current perioperative practices, and surgeons’ awareness and perception of perioperative frailty management, and barriers to its implementation.
Methods
A qualitative cross-sectional survey was sent via the World Society of Emergency Surgery e-letter to their members. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and reported by themes: risk scoring systems, frailty awareness and assessment and barriers to implementation.
Result
Of 168/1000 respondents, 38% were aware of the terms “Perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery” (POPS) and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). 66.6% of respondents assessed perioperative risk, with 45.2% using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA-PS). 77.8% of respondents mostly agreed or agreed with the statement that they routinely conducted medical comorbidity management, and pain and falls risk assessment during emergency surgical admissions. Although 98.2% of respondents agreed that frailty was important, only 2.4% performed CGA and 1.2% used a specific frailty screening tool. Clinical frailty score was the most commonly used tool by those who did. Screening was usually conducted by surgical trainees. Key barriers included a lack of knowledge about frailty assessment, a lack of clarity on who should be responsible for frailty screening, and a lack of trained staff.
Conclusions
Our study highlights the ubiquitous lack of awareness regarding frailty assessment and the POPS model of care. More training and clear guidelines on frailty scoring, alongside support by multidisciplinary teams, may reduce the burden on surgical trainees, potentially improving rates of appropriate frailty assessment and management of the frailty syndrome in emergency surgical patients.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Emergency Medicine,Surgery
Reference25 articles.
1. Centre for Perioperative Care. Perioperative Care for Older People undergoing Surgery Network (POPS) | Centre for Perioperative Care. 2021; Available from: https://cpoc.org.uk/perioperative-care-older-people-undergoing-surgery-network-pops
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian hospital statistics 2012–13. Health services series no. 54. Cat. no. HSE 145. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
3. Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0329-8.
4. Centre for perioperative care. Guideline for Perioperative Care for People Living with Frailty Undergoing Elective and Emergency Surgery. 2021. Available from: https://www.cpoc.org.uk/sites/cpoc/files/documents/2021-09/CPOC-BGS-Frailty-Guideline-2021.pdf
5. Rockwood K, Stadnyk K, MacKnight C, McDowell I, Hébert R, Hogan DB. A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people. vol. 353, Lancet (London, England). England; 1999. p. 205–6.