Author:
Yuan Zhen,Zhang Ying,Cao Dongyan,Shen Keng,Li Qingshui,Zhang Guonan,Wu Xiaohua,Cui Manhua,Yue Ying,Cheng Wenjun,Wang Li,Qu Pengpeng,Tao Guangshi,Hou Jianqing,Sun Lixin,Meng Yuanguang,Li Guiling,Li Changzhong,Shi Huirong,Chen Yaqing
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PLD in treating of in patients who experience epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal, and peritoneal cancer progression within 12 months after the first-line platinum-based therapy.
Methods
This was an open-label, single-arm and multicenter clinical trial. The ORR was the interim primary objective, and the DCR, AEs and QOL were the secondary objectives. The impact of factors on efficacy outcomes, the change trend of CA125 and the artificial platinum-free interval were exploratory endpoints.
Results
Totally, 115 patients were enrolled in this study and included in the ITT population. Moreover, 101 patients were included in the safety population. The median follow-up time was 4 months (IQR 2–6). In the ITT population, the confirmed ORR was 37.4% (95% CI, 28.4–46.4%), and the DCR was 65.2% (95% CI, 56.4–74.1%). The previous response status to platinum-based chemotherapy and baseline CA125 levels were significantly correlated with the ORR. The ORR was significantly higher in patients with a CA125 decrease after the first cycle than in the patients with a CA125 increase. The most common grade 3 or higher AE was hand-foot syndrome (3 [3.0%] of 101 patients). No statistically significant differences existed between the baseline and the postbaseline questionnaires.
Conclusions
For patients who experience platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory relapse, the use of PLD may be acceptable because of the associated satisfactory efficacy, low frequency of AEs and high patient QOL. Moreover, a low CA125 level at baseline and a reduction in CA125 after the first cycle are predictive factors for satisfactory efficacy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Oncology
Reference47 articles.
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.
2. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2014, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/, based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2017.
3. Luvero D, Milani A, Ledermann JA. Treatment options in recurrent ovarian cancer: latest evidence and clinical potential. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2014;6:229–39.
4. Ushijima K. (2010) Treatment for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer - At First Relapse Journal of Oncology 2010.
5. Oronsky B, Ray CM, Spira AI, et al. A brief review of the management of platinum-resistant-platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Med Oncol. 2017;34:103.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献