Author:
Bhaskari J.,Bhagat Rahul,Shilpa V.,Premalata C.S.,Krishnamoorthy Lakshmi
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Our explorative study assessed a panel of molecules for their association with epithelial ovarian carcinomas and their prognostic implications. The panel included tissue expression of VEGF-C, COX-2, Ki-67 and eNOS alongside plasma levels of VEGF-C and nitric oxide.
Methods
130 cases were enrolled in the study. Plasma levels were quantified by ELISA and tissue expressions were scored by immunohistochemistry. The Chi square and Fischer’s exact test were applied to examine the impact of markers on clinicopathological factors. Non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation test was applied to define the association among test factors.
Results
Plasma VEGF-C levels and COX-2 tissue expression strongly predicted recurrence and poor prognosis (< 0.001). Tissue Ki-67 was strongly indicative of late-stage disease (< 0.001). The aforementioned markers significantly associated with clinicopathological factors. Nuclear staining of VEGF-C was intriguing and was observed to correlate with high grade-stage malignancies, highly elevated plasma VEGF-C, and with recurrence. eNOS tissue expression showed no significant impact while nitric oxide associated positively with ascites levels. Tissue expression of VEGF-C did not associate significantly with poor prognosis although the expression was highly upregulated in most of the cases.
Conclusion
Plasma VEGF-C holds immense promise as a prognostic marker and the nuclear staining of VEGF-C seems to have some significant implication in molecular carcinogenesis and is a novel finding that commands further robust scrutiny. We present a first such study that assesses a set of biomarkers for prognostic implications in clinical management of epithelial ovarian carcinomas in a pan-Indian (Asian) population.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Lida Lee-Jones. Solid tumour section: Review. Ovary: Epithelial tumours. Atlas of genetics and cytogenetics in oncology and haematology. 2003. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/38083.
2. Murthy NS, Shalini S, Suman G, Pruthvish S, Mathew A. Changing trends in incidence of ovarian cancer – the Indian scenario. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:1025–30.
3. Kim A, Ueda Y, Naka T, Enomoto T. Therapeutic strategies in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Experimental Clin cancer Res. 2012;31:14.
4. Clark TG, Stewart ME, Altman DG, et al. A prognostic model for ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:944–52.
5. Berman ML. Future directions in the surgical management of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:S33–9.