Author:
Esperatti Mariano,Busico Marina,Fuentes Nora Angélica,Gallardo Adrian,Osatnik Javier,Vitali Alejandra,Wasinger Elizabeth Gisele,Olmos Matías,Quintana Jorgelina,Saavedra Santiago Nicolas,Lagazio Ana Inés,Andrada Facundo Juan,Kakisu Hiromi,Romano Nahuel Esteban,Matarrese Agustin,Mogadouro Mariela Adriana,Mast Giuliana,Moreno Claudia Navarro,Niquin Greta Dennise Rebaza,Barbaresi Veronica,Bruhn Cruz Alejandro,Ferreyro Bruno Leonel,Torres Antoni,Tirado Anabel Miranda,Viñas María Constanza,Pintos Juan Manuel,Gonzalez Maria Eugenia,Mateos Maite,Laiz Mariela Marisol,Garcia Urrutia Jose,Ruiz Seifert Micaela,Mastroberti Emilce,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure (ARF), awake prone positioning (AW-PP) reduces the need for intubation in patients treated with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). However, the effects of different exposure times on clinical outcomes remain unclear. We evaluated the effect of AW-PP on the risk of endotracheal intubation and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19-related ARF treated with HFNO and analyzed the effects of different exposure times to AW-PP.
Methods
This multicenter prospective cohort study in six ICUs of 6 centers in Argentine consecutively included patients > 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19-related ARF requiring HFNO from June 2020 to January 2021. In the primary analysis, the main exposure was awake prone positioning for at least 6 h/day, compared to non-prone positioning (NON-PP). In the sensitivity analysis, exposure was based on the number of hours receiving AW-PP. Inverse probability weighting–propensity score (IPW-PS) was used to adjust the conditional probability of treatment assignment. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation (ETI); and the secondary outcome was hospital mortality.
Results
During the study period, 580 patients were screened and 335 were included; 187 (56%) tolerated AW-PP for [median (p25–75)] 12 (9–16) h/day and 148 (44%) served as controls. The IPW–propensity analysis showed standardized differences < 0.1 in all the variables assessed. After adjusting for other confounders, the OR (95% CI) for ETI in the AW-PP group was 0.36 (0.2–0.7), with a progressive reduction in OR as the exposure to AW-PP increased. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for hospital mortality in the AW-PP group ≥ 6 h/day was 0.47 (0.19–1.31). The exposure to prone positioning ≥ 8 h/d resulted in a further reduction in OR [0.37 (0.17–0.8)].
Conclusion
In the study population, AW-PP for ≥ 6 h/day reduced the risk of endotracheal intubation, and exposure ≥ 8 h/d reduced the risk of hospital mortality.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine