Neurologic complications in patients receiving aortic versus subclavian versus femoral arterial cannulation for post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support: results of the PELS observational multicenter study

Author:

Chiarini Giovanni,Mariani Silvia,Schaefer Anne-Kristin,van Bussel Bas C. T.,Di Mauro Michele,Wiedemann Dominik,Saeed Diyar,Pozzi Matteo,Botta Luca,Boeken Udo,Samalavicius Robertas,Bounader Karl,Hou Xiaotong,Bunge Jeroen J. H.,Buscher Hergen,Salazar Leonardo,Meyns Bart,Herr Daniel,Matteucci Sacha,Sponga Sandro,Ramanathan Kollengode,Russo Claudio,Formica Francesco,Sakiyalak Pranya,Fiore Antonio,Camboni Daniele,Raffa Giuseppe Maria,Diaz Rodrigo,Wang I-wen,Jung Jae-Seung,Belohlavek Jan,Pellegrino Vin,Bianchi Giacomo,Pettinari Matteo,Barbone Alessandro,Garcia José P.,Shekar Kiran,Whitman Glenn J. R.,Lorusso Roberto, ,Heuts Samuel,Conci Luca,Khalil Jawad,Lehmann Sven,Obadia Jean-Francois,Loforte Antonio,Pacini Davide,Kalampokas Nikolaos,Jankuviene Agne,Bounader Karl,Flecher Erwan,Dos Reis Miranda Dinis,Sriranjan Kogulan,Mazzeffi Michael A.,Di Eusanio Marco,Vendramin Igor,MacLaren Graeme,Sorokin Vitaly,Costetti Alessandro,Schmid Chistof,Castillo Roberto,Grus Tomas,Solinas Marco

Abstract

Abstract Background Cerebral perfusion may change depending on arterial cannulation site and may affect the incidence of neurologic adverse events in post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (ECLS). The current study compares patients' neurologic outcomes with three commonly used arterial cannulation strategies (aortic vs. subclavian/axillary vs. femoral artery) to evaluate if each ECLS configuration is associated with different rates of neurologic complications. Methods This retrospective, multicenter (34 centers), observational study included adults requiring post-cardiotomy ECLS between January 2000 and December 2020 present in the Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS) Study database. Patients with Aortic, Subclavian/Axillary and Femoral cannulation were compared on the incidence of a composite neurological end-point (ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, brain edema). Secondary outcomes were overall in-hospital mortality, neurologic complications as cause of in-hospital death, and post-operative minor neurologic complications (seizures). Association between cannulation and neurological outcomes were investigated through linear mixed-effects models. Results This study included 1897 patients comprising 26.5% Aortic (n = 503), 20.9% Subclavian/Axillary (n = 397) and 52.6% Femoral (n = 997) cannulations. The Subclavian/Axillary group featured a more frequent history of hypertension, smoking, diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, dialysis, peripheral artery disease and previous stroke. Neuro-monitoring was used infrequently in all groups. Major neurologic complications were more frequent in Subclavian/Axillary (Aortic: n = 79, 15.8%; Subclavian/Axillary: n = 78, 19.6%; Femoral: n = 118, 11.9%; p < 0.001) also after mixed-effects model adjustment (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.02–2.31], p = 0.041). Seizures were more common in Subclavian/Axillary (n = 13, 3.4%) than Aortic (n = 9, 1.8%) and Femoral cannulation (n = 12, 1.3%, p = 0.036). In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation (Aortic: n = 344, 68.4%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 223, 56.2%, Femoral: n = 587, 58.9%, p < 0.001), as shown by Kaplan–Meier curves. Anyhow, neurologic cause of death (Aortic: n = 12, 3.9%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 14, 6.6%, Femoral: n = 28, 5.0%, p = 0.433) was similar. Conclusions In this analysis of the PELS Study, Subclavian/Axillary cannulation was associated with higher rates of major neurologic complications and seizures. In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation, despite no significant differences in incidence of neurological cause of death in these patients. These results encourage vigilance for neurologic complications and neuromonitoring use in patients on ECLS, especially with Subclavian/Axillary cannulation. Graphical abstract

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3