Author:
Blythe Robin,Parsons Rex,Barnett Adrian G.,Cook David,McPhail Steven M.,White Nicole M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Binary classification models are frequently used to predict clinical deterioration, however they ignore information on the timing of events. An alternative is to apply time-to-event models, augmenting clinical workflows by ranking patients by predicted risks. This study examines how and why time-to-event modelling of vital signs data can help prioritise deterioration assessments using lift curves, and develops a prediction model to stratify acute care inpatients by risk of clinical deterioration.
Methods
We developed and validated a Cox regression for time to in-hospital mortality. The model used time-varying covariates to estimate the risk of clinical deterioration. Adult inpatient medical records from 5 Australian hospitals between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020 were used for model development and validation. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed using internal–external cross validation. A discrete-time logistic regression model predicting death within 24 h with the same covariates was used as a comparator to the Cox regression model to estimate differences in predictive performance between the binary and time-to-event outcome modelling approaches.
Results
Our data contained 150,342 admissions and 1016 deaths. Model discrimination was higher for Cox regression than for discrete-time logistic regression, with cross-validated AUCs of 0.96 and 0.93, respectively, for mortality predictions within 24 h, declining to 0.93 and 0.88, respectively, for mortality predictions within 1 week. Calibration plots showed that calibration varied by hospital, but this can be mitigated by ranking patients by predicted risks.
Conclusion
Time-varying covariate Cox models can be powerful tools for triaging patients, which may lead to more efficient and effective care in time-poor environments when the times between observations are highly variable.
Funder
Digital Health CRC
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Blythe R, Parsons R, White NM, Cook D, McPhail SM. A scoping review of real-time automated clinical deterioration alerts and evidence of impacts on hospitalised patient outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022;31(10):725–34.
2. Gerry S, Bonnici T, Birks J, Kirtley S, Virdee PS, Watkinson PJ, Collins GS. Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: systematic review and critical appraisal of methodology. BMJ. 2020;369: m1501.
3. Smith ME, Chiovaro JC, O’Neil M, Kansagara D, Quinones AR, Freeman M, et al. Early warning system scores for clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(9):1454–65.
4. Martinez VA, Betts RK, Scruth EA, Buckley JD, Cadiz VR, Bertrand LD, et al. The kaiser permanente northern california advance alert monitor program: an automated early warning system for adults at risk for in-hospital clinical deterioration. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022;48(8):370–5.
5. van der Vegt AH, Campbell V, Mitchell I, Malycha J, Simpson J, Flenady T, et al. Systematic review and longitudinal analysis of implementing artificial Intelligence to predict clinical deterioration in adult hospitals: what is known and what remains uncertain. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024;31(2):509–24.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献