Author:
Choi Yeongho,Park Jeong Ho,Jeong Joo,Kim Yu Jin,Song Kyoung Jun,Shin Sang Do
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is inconclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. We aimed to evaluate the association between ECPR and neurologic recovery in OHCA patients using time-dependent propensity score matching analysis.
Methods
Using a nationwide OHCA registry, adult medical OHCA patients who underwent CPR at the emergency department between 2013 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome was a good neurological recovery at discharge. Time-dependent propensity score matching was used to match patients who received ECPR to those at risk for ECPR within the same time interval. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated, and stratified analysis by the timing of ECPR was also performed.
Results
Among 118,391 eligible patients, 484 received ECPR. After 1:4 time-dependent propensity score matching, 458 patients in the ECPR group and 1832 patients in the no ECPR group were included in the matched cohort. In the matched cohort, ECPR was not associated with good neurological recovery (10.3% in ECPR and 6.9% in no ECPR; RR [95% CI] 1.28 [0.85–1.93]). In the stratified analyses according to the timing of matching, ECPR with a pump-on within 45 min after emergency department arrival was associated with favourable neurological outcomes (RR [95% CI] 2.51 [1.33–4.75] in 1–30 min, 1.81 [1.11–2.93] in 31–45 min, 1.07 (0.56–2.04) in 46–60 min, and 0.45 (0.11–1.91) in over 60 min).
Conclusions
ECPR itself was not associated with good neurological recovery, but early ECPR was positively associated with good neurological recovery. Research on how to perform ECPR at an early stage and clinical trials to evaluate the effect of ECPR is warranted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference47 articles.
1. Kennedy JH. The role of assisted circulation in cardiac resuscitation. JAMA. 1966;197(8):615–8.
2. MacLaren G, Masoumi A, Brodie D. ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: more evidence is needed. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):7.
3. Holmberg MJ, Geri G, Wiberg S, Guerguerian AM, Donnino MW, Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Andersen LW. International liaison committee on resuscitation’s advanced life S, pediatric task F: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2018;131:91–100.
4. Ahn C, Kim W, Cho Y, Choi KS, Jang BH, Lim TH. Efficacy of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adult cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34208.
5. Chen Z, Liu C, Huang J, Zeng P, Lin J, Zhu R, Lu J, Zhou Z, Zuo L, Liu G. Clinical efficacy of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults with cardiac arrest: meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:6414673.