Author:
Zdolsek Markus,Hahn Robert G.,Sjöberg Folke,Zdolsek Joachim H.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Burn injury is associated with a long-standing inflammatory reaction. The use of albumin solutions for plasma volume support is controversial because of concerns of increased capillary leakage, which could aggravate the commonly seen interstitial oedema.
Methods
In the present open controlled clinical trial, an intravenous infusion of 20% albumin at 3 mL/kg was given over 30 min to 15 burn patients and 15 healthy volunteers. Blood samples and urine were collected for 5 h. Plasma dilution, plasma albumin and colloid osmotic pressure were compared. Mass balance calculations were used to estimate plasma volume expansion and capillary leakage of fluid and albumin.
Results
The patients were studied between 4 and 14 (median, 7) days after the burn injury, which spread over 7–48% (median, 15%) of the total body surface area. The albumin solution expanded the plasma volume by almost 15%, equivalent to twice the infused volume, in both groups. The urinary excretion exceeded the infused volume by a factor of 2.5. Capillary leakage of albumin occurred at a rate of 3.4 ± 1.5 g/h in burn patients and 3.7 ± 1.6 g/h in the volunteers (P = 0.61), which corresponded to 2.4 ± 1.0% and 2.5 ± 1.2% per hour of the intravascular pool (P = 0.85). The median half-life of the plasma volume expansion was 5.9 (25th–75th percentiles 2.7–11.7) h in the burn patients and 6.9 (3.4–8.5) h in the volunteers (P = 0.56).
Conclusions
Albumin 20% was an effective volume expander in patients at 1 week post-burn. No relevant differences were found between burn patients and healthy volunteers.
Trial registration
EudraCT 2016-000996-26 on May 31, 2016.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference27 articles.
1. Mårtensson J, Bihari S, Bannard-Smith J, Glassford NJ, Lloyd-Donald P, et al. Small volume resuscitation with 20% albumin in intensive care: physiological effects: the SWIPE randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care. 2018;44:1797–806.
2. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsjo E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens. A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:641–8.
3. Kara A, Akin S, Ince C. Monitoring of the microcirculation. In: Hahn RG, editor. Clinical fluid therapy in the perioperative setting. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 82–91.
4. Lund T, Wiig H, Reed RK. Acute postburn edema: role of strongly negative interstitial fluid pressure. Am J Phys. 1988;255:H1069–74.
5. Arthurson G. Microvascular permeability to macromolecules in thermal injury. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979;463(Suppl):111–22.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献