Author:
Boeck Lucas,Pargger Hans,Schellongowski Peter,Luyt Charles-Edouard,Maggiorini Marco,Jahn Kathleen,Muller Grégoire,Lötscher Rene,Bucher Evelyne,Cueni Nadine,Staudinger Thomas,Chastre Jean,Siegemund Martin,Tamm Michael,Stolz Daiana
Abstract
Abstract
Background
ICU risk assessment tools, routinely used for predicting population outcomes, are not recommended for evaluating individual risk. The state of health of single patients is mostly subjectively assessed to inform relatives and presumably to decide on treatment decisions. However, little is known how subjective and objective survival estimates compare.
Methods
We performed a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients across five European centres, assessed 62 objective markers and asked the clinical staff to subjectively estimate the probability of surviving 28 days.
Results
Within the 961 included patients, we identified 27 single objective predictors for 28-day survival (73.8%) and pooled them into predictive groups. While patient characteristics and treatment models performed poorly, the disease and biomarker models had a moderate discriminative performance for predicting 28-day survival, which improved for predicting 1-year survival. Subjective estimates of nurses (c-statistic [95% CI] 0.74 [0.70–0.78]), junior physicians (0.78 [0.74–0.81]) and attending physicians (0.75 [0.72–0.79]) discriminated survivors from non-survivors at least as good as the combination of all objective predictors (c-statistic: 0.67–0.72). Unexpectedly, subjective estimates were insufficiently calibrated, overestimating death in high-risk patients by about 20% in absolute terms. Combining subjective and objective measures refined discrimination and reduced the overestimation of death.
Conclusions
Subjective survival estimates are simple, cheap and similarly discriminative as objective models; however, they overestimate death risking that live-saving therapies are withheld. Therefore, subjective survival estimates of individual patients should be compared with objective tools and interpreted with caution if not agreeing.
Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN59376582, retrospectively registered October 31st 2013.
Funder
Freie Akademische Gesellschaft Basel
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
University of Basel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine