Abstract
AbstractSeptoplasty is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in otorhinolaryngology to overcome nasal obstruction. Following septal surgery, nasal packs are commonly inserted by surgeons to support and appose septal flaps the types of which depend on the preference and experience of the surgeon.Background We conducted a study to compare the Merocel sponge with that of a newly developed septal clip with the splint in patients who underwent septoplasty or submucosal resection to find out which one is better. A total of 50 patients were included in the study over a period of 3 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 25 each where group M is for patients receiving Merocel after surgery and group C is for patients receiving septal clips with splints.Aim The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of a Merocel pack on nasal functions with that of the septal clip and their eventual complications and outcome in the post-operative period.Results The main observations that were found in both groups in the immediate postoperative period were (1) pain (2) nasal obstruction (3) sleep disturbance (4) headache (5) epiphora (6) dryness of mouth and (7) postnasal drip. Pain was mild to moderate in the case of group M (MPS was 2.4) and moderate to severe degree in the case of group C (MPS was 5.7).Nasal obstruction was more common in Merocel group patients. Sleep disturbance, headache, epiphora, post-nasal drip, and dryness of mouth were also more in the Merocel group. After pack removal in both groups, the nasal examination was done to see crusts, vestibulitis, and septal ulcers. All these findings were more in the septal clip with the splint group.Conclusions It was observed that Merocel nasal packing causes significant morbidity and discomfort in the immediate post-operative period as compared to septal clips. It is also expensive. The new septal clips with splints can be used as an effective alternative to Merocel for approximation of flaps after septal surgery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference16 articles.
1. Rao JJ, Vinay Kumar EC, Ram Babu K, Chowdary VS, Singh J, Rangamani SV (2005) Classification of nasal septal deviations-Relation to sinonasal pathology. Indian J Otolaryngol Head and Neck surg 57(3):199–201
2. Yigit O, Ciner U, Uslu B, Akgul G, Topuz E, Dadas B (2002) The effect of nasal packing with or without an airway on arterial blood gases during sleep. J Ear Nose and Throat 9(5):347–350
3. Cukuvora I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC, Demirhan E, Gumussoy M (2012) Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32(2):111–114
4. Basavaraj NW, Rashinkar SM, Watwe MV, Fathima A, Kakkeri A (2011) A Comparative Study of Septoplasty With or Without Nasal Packing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 63(3):247–248
5. Teresa M, Sandra B, Nuno A, Limac B, Helenad D, Condéd A (2013) Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 79(4):471–474