Abstract
Abstract
Background
Scientific studies require a well-prepared cascade of steps starting from the idea and formulating a research question passing through collecting data and analysis of the results to proper writing a good article and publication. The methodology section is the core of any scientific article.
Main body
Study designs in otolaryngology can be classified as “observational studies,” “experimental (interventional) studies,” and “meta-analysis—systematic review.” There may be a huge range in quality between kinds of studies. To standardize the method of reporting the quality of studies and include all important aspects in the evaluation process, a team of scientists created the reporting guidelines checklists.
Conclusions
In this article, we give a comprehensive review that can help authors to understand study designs in otolaryngology along with the appropriate reporting guidelines used in each study.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference10 articles.
1. Sut N (2013) How can we improve the quality of scientific research and publications? Guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. Balk Med J 30:134–135
2. Rohrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Blettner M (2009) Types of study in medical research: part 3 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 106:262–268
3. İskit AB (2008) İlaçlarla yapılan gözlemsel (farmakoepidemiyolojik) çalışmalar kılavuzu. İKU Dergisi 20:25–33
4. Dawson B, Trapp RG (2004) Basic and clinical biostatistics. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, New York
5. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, CARE group, (2014) The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol 67:46–51