Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect. The PANAS has been validated in several languages, and it has shown excellent psychometric properties in the general population and some clinical samples, such as forensic samples, substance users, and adult women with fibromyalgia. Nevertheless, the psychometric properties of the scale have not yet been examined in clinical samples with anxiety, depressive, and adjustment disorders. In addition, the proliferation of Internet-based treatments has led to the development of a wide range of assessments conducted online with digital versions of pen and paper self-report questionnaires. However, no validations have been carried out to analyze the psychometric properties of the online version of the PANAS. The present study investigates the psychometric properties of the online Spanish version of the PANAS in a clinical sample of individuals with emotional disorders.
Methods
The sample was composed of 595 Spanish adult volunteers with a diagnosis of depressive disorder (n = 237), anxiety disorder (n = 284), or adjustment disorder (n = 74). Factor structure, construct validity, internal consistency, and sensitivity to change were analyzed.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a latent structure of two independent factors, consistent with previous validations of the instrument. The analyses showed adequate convergent and discriminant validity, good internal consistency as well as sensitivity to change.
Conclusions
Overall, the results obtained in this study show that the online version of the PANAS has adequate psychometric properties for the assessment of positive and negative affect in a Spanish clinical population.
Funder
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference83 articles.
1. Gray EK, Watson D. Assessing positive and negative affect via self-report. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment; 2007.
2. Rosenberg EL. Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998;2(3):247-70.
3. Gross J, Sutton SK, Ketelaar T. Relations between affect and personality: support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Clin Soc Psychol Bull. 1998;24(3):279–88.
4. Parkinson B, Totterdell P, Briner R, Reynolds S. Changing moods: the psychology of mood and mood regulation; 1996.
5. Lucas RE, Diener E, Larsen RJ. Measuring positive emotions. In: Positive psychological assessment: a handbook of models and measures. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 201–18.
Cited by
112 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献