Health economics study of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia: a 12-month cohort study
-
Published:2024-06-12
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-244X
-
Container-title:BMC Psychiatry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Psychiatry
Author:
Luo Xing,Liu Fang,Lu Jin,Cheng Yuqi,Xu Xiufeng,He Xiaolin,Xia Yongbing,Gao Changqing,Xie Xian,Zhao Yu,Gao Chunqiang,Ding Hua,He Yuefei,Zhang Lifen,Zhang Xi,Song Jianhui,Yang Shunying,Liu Liming,Chen Wenming,Liu Wei,Luo Chuanlin,Pu Ensheng,Lei Ming,Wang Yan,Sun Zanzong,Yang Rucheng,Zhou Yong,Zhu Xianrong,Wang Bo,He Shuhua,Gao Donghua,Li Zhongcai,Huang Liqiong,Wang Tianlan,Yang Guangya,Liu Hong,Zhao Jinkun,Wang Jicai
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To analyze the economic benefits of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia.
Methods
We collected 546 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia according to the 《International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,10th》(ICD-10). We gathered general population data such as gender, age, marital status, and education level, then initiated treatment with paliperidone palmitate. Then Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the start of treatment to assess clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and injection doses. We also collected information on the economic burden before and after 12 months of treatment, as well as the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations in the past year to analyze economic benefits.
Results
The baseline patients totaled 546, with 239 still receiving treatment with paliperidone palmitate 12 months later. After 12 months of treatment, the number of outpatient visits per year increased compared to before (4 (2,10) vs. 12 (4,12), Z=-5.949, P < 0.001), while the number of hospitalizations decreased (1 (1,3) vs. 1 (1,2), Z = 5.625, P < 0.001). The inpatient costs in the direct medical expenses of patients after 12 months of treatment decreased compared to before (5000(2000,12000) vs. 3000 (1000,8050), P < 0.05), while there was no significant change in outpatient expenses and direct non-medical expenses (transportation, accommodation, meal, and family accompanying expenses, etc.) (P > 0.05); the indirect costs of patients after 12 months of treatment (lost productivity costs for patients and families, economic costs due to destructive behavior, costs of seeking non-medical assistance) decreased compared to before (300(150,600) vs. 150(100,200), P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Palmatine palmitate reduces the number of hospitalizations for patients, as well as their direct and indirect economic burdens, and has good economic benefits.
Funder
Yunnan academic leader
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Schneider-Thoma J, Chalkou K, Dörries C, Bighelli I, Ceraso A, Huhn M, Siafis S, Davis JM, Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotics for the maintenance treatment of adults with schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10327):824–36. 2. Kwon JS, Kim SN, Han J, Lee SI, Chang JS, Choi JS, Lee HJ, Cho SJ, Jun TY, Lee SH, et al. Satisfaction of immediate or delayed switch to paliperidone palmitate in patients unsatisfied with current oral atypical antipsychotics. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;30(6):320–8. 3. Global regional. and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Psychiatry 2022, 9(2):137–150. 4. Kishimoto T, Robenzadeh A, Leucht C, Leucht S, Watanabe K, Mimura M, Borenstein M, Kane JM, Correll CU. Long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(1):192–213. 5. Kramer M, Litman R, Hough D, Lane R, Lim P, Liu Y, Eerdekens M. Paliperidone palmitate, a potential long-acting treatment for patients with schizophrenia. Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;13(5):635–47.
|
|