Author:
van Oosten Ard J.,van Mens Kasper,Blonk Roland W. B.,Burdorf Alex,Tiemens Bea
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Previous studies have shown that being employed is associated not only with patients’ health but also with the outcome of their treatment for severe mental illness. This study examined what influence employment had on improvements in mental health and functioning among patients with common mental disorders who received brief treatment and how patients’ diagnosis, environmental and individual factors moderated the association between being employed and treatment outcome.
Methods
The study used naturalistic data from a cohort of patients in a large mental health franchise in the Netherlands. The data were obtained from electronic registration systems, intake questionnaires and Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework was used to identify potential subgroups of patients. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between employment status and treatment outcome and to determine how the relationship differed among ICF subgroups of patients.
Results
A strong relationship was found between employment status and the outcome of brief therapy for patients with common mental disorders. After potential confounding variables had been controlled, patients who were employed were 54% more likely to recover compared to unemployed patients. Two significant interactions were identified. Among patients who were 60 years of age or younger, being employed was positively related to recovery, but this relationship disappeared in patients older than 60 years. Second, among patients in all living situations there was a positive effect of being employed on recovery, but this effect did not occur among children (18+) who were living with a single parent.
Conclusions
Being employed was positively associated with treatment outcome among both people with a severe mental illness and those with a common mental disorder (CMD). The main strength of this study was its use of a large dataset from a nationwide franchised company. Attention to work is important not only for people with a severe mental illness, but also for people with a CMD. This means that in addition to re-integration methods that focus on people with a severe mental illness, more interventions are needed for people with a CMD.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference35 articles.
1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: The Stationery Office; 2006. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/is-work-good-for-your-health-and-well-being. Accessed April 1 2023.
2. Gill F. The meaning of work: lessons from sociology, psychology, and political theory. J Socio Econ. 1999;28(6):725–43.
3. Van Hedel K, Van Lenthe FJ, Avendano M, Bopp M, Esnaola S, Kovacs K, et al. Marital status, labour force activity and mortality: a study in the USA and six European countries. Scand J Public Health. 2015;43(5):469–80.
4. Affleck W, Carmichael V, Whitley R. Men’s mental health: social determinants and implications for services. Can J Psychiatry. 2018;63(9):581–9.
5. Dalglish SL, Melchior M, Younes N, Surkan PJ. Work characteristics and suicidal ideation in young adults in France. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(4):613–20.