Author:
Grünwald L. M.,Duddy C.,Byng R.,Crellin N.,Moncrieff J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Increasing number of service users diagnosed with schizophrenia and psychosis are being discharged from specialist secondary care services to primary care, many of whom are prescribed long-term antipsychotics. It is unclear if General Practitioners (GPs) have the confidence and experience to appropriately review and adjust doses of antipsychotic medication without secondary care support.
Aim
To explore barriers and facilitators of conducting antipsychotic medication reviews in primary care for individuals with no specialist mental health input.
Design & setting
Realist review in general practice settings.
Method
A realist review has been conducted to synthesise evidence on antipsychotic medication reviews conducted in primary care with service users diagnosed with schizophrenia or psychosis. Following initial scoping searches and discussions with stakeholders, a systematic search and iterative secondary searches were conducted. Articles were systematically screened and analysed to develop a realist programme theory explaining the contexts (C) and mechanisms (M) which facilitate or prevent antipsychotic medication reviews (O) in primary care settings, and the potential outcomes of medication reviews.
Results
Meaningful Antipsychotic medication reviews may not occur for individuals with only primary care medical input. Several, often mutually reinforcing, mechanisms have been identified as potential barriers to conducting such reviews, including low expectations of recovery for people with severe mental illness, a perceived lack of capability to understand and participate in medication reviews, linked with a lack of information shared in appointments between GPs and Service Users, perceived risk and uncertainty regarding antipsychotic medication and illness trajectory.
Conclusions
The review identified reciprocal and reinforcing stereotypes affecting both GPs and service users. Possible mechanisms to counteract these barriers are discussed, including realistic expectations of medication, and the need for increased information sharing and trust between GPs and service users.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference92 articles.
1. Burns T, Kendrick T. The primary care of patients with schizophrenia: a search for good practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47(421):515–20.
2. Kendrick B, Freeling S. Provision of care to general practice patients with disabling long-term mental illness: a survey in 16 practices. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44(384):301–5.
3. Reilly S, Planner C, Hann M, Reeves D, Nazareth I, Lester H. The role of primary care in service provision for people with severe mental illness in the United Kingdom. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36468.
4. Taylor D, Barnes T, Young A. The Maudsley prescribing guidelines in psychiatry. Wiley; 2018.
5. Jones R, Major B, Fear C. Schizophrenia in a primary care setting. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(10):31–4.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献