Author:
Stoll Julia,Westermair Anna Lisa,Kübler Ulrike,Reisch Thomas,Cattapan Katja,Bridler René,Maier Robert,Trachsel Manuel
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of formal coercion such as seclusion, mechanical restraint, and forced medication is one of the most challenging and complex issues in mental health care, on the clinical, the legal, and the ethical level. Clinical ethics support aims at assisting healthcare practitioners in determining the morally most justifiable course of action in these situations. However, the effectiveness of clinical ethics support has hardly been studied so far.
Methods
Monthly moral case deliberation (MCD) was implemented in two acute wards of two different psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. Frequency and intensity of coercion was measured on ward level (npatients = 405), and the Moral Attentiveness Scale, Knowledge on Coercion Scale, and Staff Attitudes towards Coercion Scale were applied on healthcare practitioner level (nHP = 46). Pre-post-comparisons were conducted using multi-level modeling where appropriate.
Results
After implementation of MCD, formal coercion was less frequent (particularly seclusion, small effect size; 9.6 vs. 16.7%, p = .034, Cramér’s V = .105) and less intense (particularly mechanical restraint, large effect size; 86.8 ± 45.3 vs. 14.5 ± 12.1 h, exact p = .019, r = -.74), and approval for coercive measures among healthcare practitioners was lower when controlling for the number of MCD sessions attended.
Conclusions
Clinical ethics support such as MCD may be a hitherto underutilized service for the reduction of coercion, complementing existing strategies and programs. Implementing clinical ethics support may help improve quality of care for persons suffering from severe mental illness.
Funder
Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) through the Käthe Zingg-Schwichtenberg fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference41 articles.
1. Psychiatry BR, Treatment C. In: Chadwick R, editor. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. 2nd ed. Press: Academic; 2012. p. 658–66.
2. Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Coercive Measures in Medicine. SAMW: Bern; 2015. (Medical ethical guidelines) [cited 2022 Jan 17]. Available from: https://www.samw.ch/dam/jcr:e8385511-4a5d-40a9-b905-2c29aa5e73d6/guidelines_sams_coercive_measures_2015.pdf.
3. Monahan J, Hoge SK, Lidz C, Roth LH, Bennett N, Gardner W, et al. Coercion and commitment: understanding involuntary mental hospital admission. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1995;18(3):249–63.
4. Szmukler G, Appelbaum PS. Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. J Ment Health. 2008;17(3):233–44.
5. Sailas E, Fenton M. Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD001163.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献