Author:
Brouwer Jurriaan M. J. L.,Wardenaar Klaas J.,Nolte Ilja M.,Liemburg Edith J.,Bet Pierre M.,Snieder Harold,Mulder Hans,Cath Danielle C.,Penninx Brenda W. J. H.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Tailoring antidepressant drugs (AD) to patients’ genetic drug-metabolism profile is promising. However, literature regarding associations of ADs’ treatment effect and/or side effects with drug metabolizing genes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 has yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, our aim was to longitudinally investigate associations between CYP2D6 (poor, intermediate, and normal) and
CYP2C19 (poor, intermediate, normal, and ultrarapid) metabolizer-status, and switching/discontinuing of ADs. Next, we investigated whether the number of perceived side effects differed between metabolizer statuses.
Methods
Data came from the multi-site naturalistic longitudinal cohort Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). We selected depression- and/or anxiety patients, who used AD at some point in the course of the 9 years follow-up period (n = 928). Medication use was followed to assess patterns of AD switching/discontinuation over time. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 alleles were derived using genome-wide data of the NESDA samples and haplotype data from the PharmGKB database. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association of metabolizer status with switching/discontinuing ADs. Mann–Whitney U-tests were conducted to compare the number of patient-perceived side effects between metabolizer statuses.
Results
No significant associations were observed of CYP metabolizer status with switching/discontinuing ADs, nor with the number of perceived side effects.
Conclusions
We found no evidence for associations between CYP metabolizer statuses and switching/discontinuing AD, nor with side effects of ADs, suggesting that metabolizer status only plays a limited role in switching/discontinuing ADs. Additional studies with larger numbers of PM and UM patients are needed to further determine the potential added value of pharmacogenetics to guide pharmacotherapy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137-50. Available from:
2. https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy-ub.rug.nl/35026139/. [cited 2023 Jun 24].
3. Multidisciplinaire richtlijn depressie (3E REVISIE, 2013) Versie 1.0. Verantwoording. Trimbos-instituut. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/depressie/startpagina_-_depressie.html.
4. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905–17. https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy-ub.rug.nl/17074942/. [cited 2021 Nov 15].
5. van Westrhenen R, Aitchison KJ, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Jukić MM. Pharmacogenomics of Antidepressant and Antipsychotic Treatment: How Far Have We Got and Where Are We Going? Front Psychiatry. 2020;11. Available from: