Young people’s views on the acceptability and feasibility of loneliness interventions for their age group
-
Published:2024-04-23
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-244X
-
Container-title:BMC Psychiatry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Psychiatry
Author:
Eager Sharon,Johnson Sonia,Pitman Alexandra,Uribe Manuela,Qualter Pamela,Pearce Eiluned
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Loneliness is a frequently reported problem for young people aged 16 to 24 years old. A variety of interventions have been developed (but in most cases not extensively evaluated) to try and tackle loneliness in this age group. These include interpersonal, intrapersonal, and social approaches that vary in their content and mechanisms of action. The current study aimed to qualitatively examine young peoples’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of different loneliness interventions.
Methods
Young people from 16 to 24 years old living in the United Kingdom who self-identified as having experienced loneliness were recruited to participate in this study. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews to assess their views on the acceptability and feasibility of loneliness interventions for their age group. Interviews were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis.
Results
Our analysis of 23 individual interview transcripts identified six themes. These related to the appropriate stage for intervention and how different types of strategies may be best suited to particular contexts; the key facilitators and barriers to engaging young people in an intervention; considerations for optimising the delivery of an intervention; divergent views on technology use in strategies to manage loneliness; the scope of an intervention and whether it takes a targeted or general approach; and the idea of combining different options within an intervention to allow tailoring to individual preferences and nature of loneliness.
Conclusions
These findings demonstrate the need for continued development of individualised interventions designed to help manage loneliness in this age group. Future loneliness strategies should be co-produced with young people to ensure that they suit the varying needs of this population.
Funder
UK Research and Innovation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Perlman D, Peplau LA. Toward a Social Psychology of Loneliness. In: Personal Relationships. 1981. pp. 31–56.
2. Weiss Robert. Loneliness: the experience of emotional and social isolation. MIT Press; 1975.
3. Heinrich LM, Gullone E. The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26:695–718.
4. Rokach A. Loneliness updated: an introduction. J Psychol. 2012;146:1–2.
5. Wood LA. Loneliness. In: Harré R, editor. The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Blackwell; 1986. pp. 184–208.