Author:
Hustoft Kjetil,Larsen Tor Ketil,Brønnick Kolbjørn,Joa Inge,Johannessen Jan Olav,Ruud Torleif
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of the study was to explore patients’ attitudes towards voluntary and involuntary hospitalization in Norway, and predictors for involuntary patients who wanted admission.
Methods
A multi-centre study of consecutively admitted patients to emergency psychiatric wards over a 3 months period in 2005–06. Data included demographics, admission status (voluntary / involuntary), symptom levels, and whether the patients expressed a wish to be admitted regardless of judicial status. To analyse predictors of wanting admission (binary variable), a generalized linear mixed modelling was conducted, using random intercepts for the site, and fixed effects for all variables, with logit link-function.
Results
The sample comprised of 3.051 patients of witch 1.232 (40.4%) were being involuntary hospitalised. As expected 96.5% of the voluntary admitted patients wanted admission, while as many as 29.7% of the involuntary patients stated that they wanted the same. The involuntary patients wanting admission were less likely to be transported by police, had less aggression, hallucinations and delusions, more depressed mood, less use of drugs, less suicidality before admission, better social functioning and were less often referred by general practitioners compared with involuntary patients who did not want admission. In a multivariate analysis, predictors for involuntary hospitalization and wanting admission were, not being transported by police, less aggression and less use of drugs.
Conclusions
Almost a third of the involuntary admitted patients stated that they actually wanted to be hospitalized. It thus seems to be important to thoroughly address patients’ preferences, both before and after admission, regarding whether they wish to be hospitalized or not.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference55 articles.
1. Sunkel C. The UN Convention: a service user perspective. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):51–2.
2. Raffard S, Bayard S, Capdevielle D, Garcia F, Boulenger JP, Gely-Nargeot MC. Lack of insight in schizophrenia: a review. Part I: theoretical concept, clinical aspects and Amador's model. L'Encephale. 2008;34(6):597–605.
3. Ramachandran AS, Ramanathan R, Praharaj SK, Kanradi H, Sharma PS. A cross-sectional, comparative study of insight in schizophrenia and bipolar patients in remission. Indian J Psychol Med. 2016;38(3):207–12.
4. Gilleen J, Greenwood K, David AS. Domains of awareness in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(1):61–72.
5. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. Norwegian Mental Health Act revised 2. July 1999. Lov om Psykisk Helsevern. Norway MoHi, editor. Oslo, Norway 1999. 1–117. https://app.uio.no/ub/ujur/oversatte-lover/data/lov-19990702-062-eng.pdf.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献