Author:
Bailey Eleanor,Bellairs-Walsh India,Reavley Nicola,Gooding Piers,Hetrick Sarah,Rice Simon,Boland Alexandra,Robinson Jo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Digital tools have the capacity to complement and enhance clinical care for young people at risk of suicide. Despite the rapid rise of digital tools, their rate of integration into clinical practice remains low. The poor uptake of digital tools may be in part due to the lack of best-practice guidelines for clinicians and services to safely apply them with this population.
Methods
A Delphi study was conducted to produce a set of best-practice guidelines for clinicians and services on integrating digital tools into clinical care for young people at risk of suicide. First, a questionnaire was developed incorporating action items derived from peer-reviewed and grey literature, and stakeholder interviews with 17 participants. Next, two independent expert panels comprising professionals (academics and clinical staff; n = 20) and young people with lived experience of using digital technology for support with suicidal thoughts and behaviours (n = 29) rated items across two consensus rounds. Items reaching consensus (rated as “essential” or “important” by at least 80% of panel members) at the end of round two were collated into a set of guidelines.
Results
Out of 326 individual items rated by the panels, 188 (57.7%) reached consensus for inclusion in the guidelines. The endorsed items provide guidance on important topics when working with young people, including when and for whom digital tools should be used, how to select a digital tool and identify potentially harmful content, and identifying and managing suicide risk conveyed via digital tools. Several items directed at services (rather than individual clinicians) were also endorsed.
Conclusions
This study offers world-first evidence-informed guidelines for clinicians and services to integrate digital tools into clinical care for young people at risk of suicide. Implementation of the guidelines is an important next step and will hopefully lead to improved uptake of potentially helpful digital tools in clinical practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. World Health Organization, Suicide Geneva WHO. ; 2021 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Causes of death, Australia, 2021: Australian Bureau of Statistics (abs.gov.au) 2022 [.
3. Van Meter AR, Knowles EA, Mintz EH. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: international prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempt in Youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2022.
4. Hill NT, Witt K, Rajaram G, McGorry PD, Robinson J. Suicide by young australians, 2006–2015: a cross-sectional analysis of national coronial data. Med J Australia. 2021;214(3):133–9.
5. Torous J, Jän Myrick K, Rauseo-Ricupero N, Firth J. Digital mental health and COVID-19: using technology today to accelerate the curve on access and quality tomorrow. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(3):e18848.